In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
1851 conversion cylinders brass frame
DevinBarnett
Member Posts: 14 ✭✭
I was wondering if any of you fellas have ever put a conversion cylinder in an 1851 with a brass frame? I have been advised not to do it with the brass frame but i've also heard that if you use lighter loads it wont hurt the gun. What do you guys think?
Comments
v35 is correct, a 36 cal bore uses a .375 ball....trust me, I have a pair of 58 Remmies in 36cal! [;)]
There's plenty of safer alternatives out there. I'd only use a steel frame myself. If money's tight and you have your heart set on a conversion, you could always sell the brass frame gun and put the money towards a steel framed one.
You could probably have the barrel bored out and sleeved down to .38 cal (.357' dia) but then you couldn't use the purcussion cylinder anymore.
Grab one with a steel frame for the conversion cylinder.
Keep in mind that there are various kinds of brass, depending on its alloy content, and you will never know what one is. Makers may have different threading or attaching the center pin - again one never knows.
I agree with others that a .38 conversion of the brass frame '51 is bad news. I agree especially with v35 about bore size. I was going to convert a repro Remington Navy to .38 till I did some checking and found that all .38 cal ammo (repeat all) normally found in your local gunshop is too small for the bore. Even the .38 S$W (larger than the .38 Spec.) it too small to take the rifling. There are conversions that use it with some success probably due to the base of the bullet spreading somewhat on firing (a la Minie ball).
PS I did the conversion but to .22, sleeving both the cyl and bbl.