In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Opinions on rolling block actions
aap2
Member Posts: 203 ✭✭✭
I'm planning on building a single-shot rifle for plinking with, probably in one of the smaller calibers to reduce recoil (I have several old 45-70's); I am thinking a rimmed cartridge such as 30-30 on a rolling block action, mindful of the fairly weak nature of the action, I would be using blackpowder or low pressure smokeless loads. I have a tapered octagon barrel blank in 30 cal with a large enough shank diameter to fit a large rolling block action and threading/chambering it/fitting extractor is no problem. What I would like to get opinions on, is how do the modern rolling block actions (Uberti, Star, Pedersoli) compare in quality to the original Remington actions (say the 1902 smokeless or the Swedish model)? I have shot the originals, but I have never shot the reproductions. I'm guessing the the repro's already have a smaller diameter firing pin for higher pressures than the originals, but I can easily bush the breechblock of an original. Thanks.
Comments
"mindful of the fairly weak nature of the action"
Do what ?
I like the rolling block action, but it's not overly strong. While massive and usually well-made, the "joints" in the action always have a few thousanth's play in them and with a high-intensity cartridge, all of this is taken up upon firing resulting in excessive headspace. This is not a problem with rimmed cases, especially straight cases loaded to BP velocities such as the 45-70. With smokeless, rimless bottlenecks like the 7x57mm that the original Rem 1902 was chambered for often develop excess headspace and split cases when fired with factory ammo. Most reloading manuals that have loads listed for the old single shot rifles generally list the rolling block in the "weak" catagory with the trapdoor springfield. Personally, I like the rolling block and think that I will be o.k with the 30-30; Pedersoli made them in 30-30 and 22 hornet. The old rimmed cartridges seem well-suited to the rolling block, if you stay within pressure limits, IMHO. Even in an unfired original 1902 rolling block, firng most factory smokeless or milsurp 7x57 ammo is way too hot even though it's technically the correct cartridge. This is strictly my opinion, your mileage may vary. Thanks.
Thanks for all the advice; I fixed (replaced) the trigger problem on the Pedersoli rolling block and now it has a great trigger pull; the owner is still deciding if he wants to sell it (now that the trigger pull is fixed, he may keep it..a fair trade for letting me shoot it for 2 weeks). If he wants to sell it, I'll rebarrel it to 30-30. A local shooter won a Browning High Wall at a raffle, shot it with BP and rusted the bore; I'm negotiating to buy it at a reduced price. Compared to an original Winchester High Wall that I have (in 32-30 of all calibers), it seems like a great action. The simple answer is to build a rifle on both actions; a project that started out as a fairly cheap plinker just went up in price, but that's o.k. The Pedersoli may end up as a 30-30 and the High Wall as a 40-65. Thanks to all for your advice
So, how did you fix the heavy trigger pull?? I have the same problem.
Thanks
It doesn't mean the actions are structurally weak.
If you could hard chrome all the wear points, I suspect the 7mm would hold headspace.
I was shooting my #4 RB 22 the other day and realized how handy it was.
the action is short and light. If it weren't for the lousy trigger pull
I'd probably get to like it. As a collectors' item I'm reluctant to alter it.
Another caliber might be the 32-20 shooting a 30 cal bullet.