In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Ok Gun Math Gurus - this is for you
Mr. Perfect
Member, Moderator Posts: 66,381 ******
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Comments
I don't think enough information is given. What is the weight of the rifle?
Some info that can be extrapolated if I assume a 12# rifle with 100 grs of powder:
1400gr bullet @ 3000 ft/sec will generate 576 ft/# of recoil energy and a recoil velocity of 55.6 ft/sec. One of the smarter folk on here can continue from there. Bob
Edit to add - how will a 150# shooter remain on the cart with 576# of recoil?
A 1400 grain bullet going 3000fps?
The answer is 0, the cart is going zero due to the 150lb guy being blown off the end of it in a somersault will have little effect on the cart.
I tried and tried but could not come up with a answer. I know for every action there is a re-action. Does that count? ---------------------------Ray
PS: I will try to get my son the ME to help me.😀
Say what?????????????? ------------Ray
I think the cart does not move because the impact energy of the bullet against the cart counteracts the recoil energy.
Conservation of momentum yields the following theoretical speeds:
Assume the rifle weighs 6 Lbs.
The total weight of the system is thus 600+150+6+.2 = 756.2 Lbs.
Initial condition is that the system is at rest.
At the moment of firing, .2 Lbs. is moving at 3000 ft/sec. in the positive direction. As the remainder of the system is assumed to be in a zero friction condition, it will move in the negative direction at a speed inversely proportional to its mass wrt to the bullet.
So: 756 x V1 = .2 x V2 (3000 fps)
V1 = -.79 fps.
After impact, and the bullet embedding into the cart, the problem is reversed, and the system will come back to a stop.
Obviously this neglects the mass of the propellant which will also be accelerated in the direction of V1 and will not be absorbed by the cart.
From a practical standpoint, the man is not a rigid transferrer of the recoil to the cart, and the reality of the system is that the absorption of the recoil over time by the man will take longer than the flight time of the bullet, so the recoil force will not be fully transferred to the cart prior to the impact of the bullet.
The real-world situation will be the firing of the rifle, a slight movement of the cart in the positive direction as the bullet embeds, with the cart coming to a halt once the recoil force has been fully transmitted from the man's shoulder through his body to the cart.
Brad Steele
Well, I assume the gun itself will weigh more than 80lbs. That should tame the recoil a bit. It also makes the weight of the rifle not insignificant to the problem, unless the gun weighs 100 lbs and the dude weighs 50 or something. For reference, a 20mm Solothurn weighs about 118 lbs.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Do not confuse 576 ft-lbs of energy with 576 pounds of force.
Brad Steele
A 6 lb rifle? That shoots a 15 - 20 mm projectile @ 3000 ft/sec??
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
I was right, one of the smarter folk did chime in with an answer. What would your thoughts be if a muzzlebreak was added to the firearm redirecting some of the propellant thrust to the side thus slowing the recoil impulse to the shooter?
That's why I said not enough information and used the weight of a lightweight Africa big bore rifle in my calculations. The illustration doesn't indicate an 80#+ rifle because that would look much larger in proportion to the figure of the shooter.
Bob
You said math gurus, not gun gurus. 😳
If you want a 100 Lb. rifle, it doesn't change the math very much. V1 becomes -.7 fps with a 100 lb. rifle.
Brad Steele
Well, the author of the problem thinks the thing can be shoulder fired too. A 50 BMG round is what about 800 grains on the heavy end? Those bullets travel in about the same velocity range, and that is about the upper limit of what can be shoulder fired.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
As a point of fact, I said "gun math gurus". :)
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
For every action there is an opposite and equal re- action according to Newton. It would be the same as having a sail on a boat and a fan attached to the boat blowing on the sail, you’re not going to move.
That is true for the entire course of events presented, but the problem is broken down into stages. The first "equal and opposite reaction" is the movement rearward of all the mass except the bullet (in reaction to the bullet being fired), and that is what is asked.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
So the cart moves backward and the bullet stays still until the end of the cart runs into the bullet, thus stopping the cart. 😵
Um.... no. If you look at Don's analysis, Vcart = .79 ft/sec and Vbullet = 3,000 ft/sec (which was given). Assuming rigid connections, you might not even see any movement of the cart at all before the bullet hits the target and stops all motion (as you would expect).
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
I was not expecting that. Don
Assuming the image is to scale, and that the person shooting is 6 feet tall, the cart is roughly 30 feet long. The bullet originates at a point about 6 feet from one end, so the distance traveled is 24 ft. At 3000 ft/sec it will cover the 24 ft in 0.008 seconds (assuming constant velocity). In that amount of time, the cart will have moved approximately 0.076 inches (about the thickness of 19 sheets of paper).
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Not to fret.... I've passed this intellectual problem to a Super Genius -
I'm sure he will get right on it. 😁 Bob
@Mr. Perfect. I understand the stages that you are looking at now, and a can appreciate the answer that you are looking for better. However one part of the question is missing. The distance from muzzle to the target, with out it you can’t figure the time of flight of the projectile from muzzle to target.
For instance if the muzzle was against the target there would be no flight time, and then there would be no movement. With distance figured in I would imagine you could figure the velocity of the cart before projectile impacts the target. Interesting question though and food for thought.
I provided that calculation for you above.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Not true, ever watch Myth Busters ..................................... 😉
You guys are looking at it the wrong way. The man shoots the rifle, the bullet ricochets off the metal frame and goes right back at the man killing him instantly. So the answer is zero.
Glad I could sort this out for you.
Joe
Darn it Don, You must have read my mind. That is EXACTLY what I was going to post. Thanks for saving me the typing time.
I suspect you meant .02 lb. (140 gr.), not .2 lb. which would be 3.2 oz. or 1400 gr.
The recoil force equals the impact force minus the energy spent moving air.(opposite directions) So the cart will move slightly with the recoil.
Assuming the shooter can maintain his position on the car after firing a 20mm cannon, silly.
If he was standing off the cart, it would move much faster(100x?) in the opposite direction with the impact.
Or if he misses the target(and doesn’t hit the cart) . It will accelerate (101x) WTH the recoil only
If he misses the target and with no rolling resistance (assuming a zero grade) the cart would probably travel to Omaha before air resistance would stop it. 😉
After my Army days I went back to school to get my teacher's certificate. My specialty was Middle School Physical Science so I took several Physics courses.
During one "Techniques" class the professor showed us a demonstration model he was quite proud of and how it demonstrated "One of Newton's Laws" until a couple of us Physics types pointed out it was a combination of several of his laws, etc.
He just looked at us and said he'd been told "Physics types just make simple things complicated" and we all laughed.
OP example is like that -- should have been another zero in the weight of the bullet, and it should be "mass" not weight among other things.
My vote for "best answer" is by "shootuadeal"
"The answer is 0, the cart is going zero due to the 150lb guy being blown off the end of it in a somersault will have little effect on the cart."🤣
Lordy,Lordy-It's time for a beer😝
You must have forgotten the time when Earl, after starving for months in the jungle grabbed his Ma-Duece and all 70 Lbs. of him mowed down a brigade of NVA, firing from hip. Changing out white hot barrels with one hand between rounds while firing with the other. The problem assumes a real man, darn it.
Brad Steele
Ain't too many men like Earl......
I got 0.8 feet per second.
1400 grain bullet. Must be shooting an advanced potato gun.
750 pound combo of man and cart. Man stays stationery, somehow.
3000 fps bullet (assuming Russet or comparable spud)
🇺🇲 "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." - Thomas Jefferson 🇺🇲
Or in short. You cannot move a target with terminal energy when the shooter is on the cart.(if no air resistance they will perfectly cancel out)
if he misses cart will move with the recoil.
If he’s not on the cart you can move it with the terminal energy
but in the problem. Whatever energy is lost from wind resistance will be the only force slightly moving the cart in the direction of recoil
the recoil energy = terminal energy+energy lost to atmospheric
recoil 100%=almost 100+ tiny bit lost to atmospheric drag
since terminal energy isn’t equal in this case with air resistance it is unbalanced, with slightly more recoil than terminal
if the bullet splatter and doesn’t deliver all its energy in a linear force, this will further increase the movement of the cart with recoil
lets nerd it up some more ,
above I’m talking about overall forces. Of course the recoil energy is first so the cart will roll with the recoil first, then stop (assuming no air resistance, target perfectly absorbs energy directly opposite the recoil)
but if there is significant air resistance or bullet splatting wasting energy the cart will maintain some of the velocity imparted from the recoil, cause the terminal energy quite equal
it doesn’t matter weight of the rifle or the man, only the total weight of the cart with everything on it
OK so I am on Google Platform as a participant and a new artificial intelligence program beta test
here’s what AI says
That calculator chart is a hoot, thank you for sharing.
My worst nightmares contain STORY PROBLEMS!!! Have hated them ever since Elementary school!
I have been told that I have an "Analytical Brain" 😁 I guess that's better than "Abby Normal"
😁