In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options
Rechamber ?
legn4
Member Posts: 481 ✭✭✭
Could a rifle in (bolt action) 338 Win Mag be rechambered to
340 Weatherby Mag ? From I see they are close , just asking.
Thanks
340 Weatherby Mag ? From I see they are close , just asking.
Thanks
Comments
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.340_Weatherby_Magnum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.338_Winchester_Magnum
A buddy got a rifle from his dying mom. Bubba re-chambered a 7x61 S&H SaKo rifle to 7mm STW. Made a nice 2 shot rifle with proper ammo. The correct loads wouldn't fit in the mag box. Drop one in the chamber, place one in the mag, press it down - close bolt over top.
In looking at the various candidate .338 caliber cartridges my research indicates that there is very little realistic difference in potential between the .340, the .338 RUM and the vaunted .338 Lapua. They are all capable of generating maximum velocities within 50-150 fps of each other depending on bullet weight for the 250-300 grain class of bullets. The Weatherby brass is expensive, until you start pricing Lapua brass. The Weatherby is the only round capable of being made from a variety of "donor" rounds from .300 H&H to the .375 H&H plus the .300 and .375 Whby's as well. The long bullets in this class all have driving surfaces in excess of .581" so the bullet is well engaged in the rifling before it fully leaves the case. This bridges the .314" free-bore of the Weatherby chamber and leaves the bullet aligned and stable.
FWIW
Pay attention to the discussions above which cover the magazine lengths of commercial actions. They are not all created equal.
Who is the barrel maker for the .338 WM? Some commercial barrels will not lend themselves to being re-chambered.
How many shots have been fired on this chamber and barrel? Too many rounds fired and the throat may too far advanced to allow for a quality re-chamber even if the new chamber is slightly longer. If there is substantial carbon build up in front of the throat on the original chamber, many gunsmiths will not run an expensive reamer into that barrel for fear of damaging the reamer.
I agree with the thinking that there are other cartridges to use instead of the expensive .340 Weatherby.
As above, I think the .338 RUM is a superb cartridge which has not been given the credit it deserves. One jump up from there is the .338 Edge which is the .300 RUM necked with some changes in the design of the throat and freebore, often noted as the .338 Edge Plus. These cartridges maintain the standard magnum rim diameter of 0.532" so you won't have to rework the bolt also.
If I was finding that the re-chamber and all of the attending costs were growing beyond what I thought was reasonable, I would switch to an action which utilizes the Lapua bolt face but shoot the .338 Norma Magnum cartridge. Of all the .338's I have in process, this is my choice for the best cartridge.
Best.
quote:In looking at the various candidate .338 caliber cartridges my research indicates that there is very little realistic difference in potential between the .340, the .338 RUM and the vaunted .338 Lapua.
This is because of the limitation imposed by barrel length and chamber designs most commonly used outside of match and longer range target shooting. Surprisingly, you didn't include the .338 Norma Mag which is overtaking the Lapua when it comes to both hunting and competition.
When the barrel length and chamber design is matched to the cartridge/bullet and powder combination, the real differences start to show up. But this is not a simple generic solution. It's aimed [}:)] at the folks who choose to maximize the performance of any cartridge, not your everyday hunter and casual target shooter. Slower powders, longer barrels, heavier or even lighter bullets will show some decided differences.
Best.
quote:Not worth the effort. You will never see the difference in performance,
When posters fall back on the final effect of 'dead is dead', you are correct. But using that same logic the examples can be changed and down graded to something along the lines of the .223 Rem. in states where it is allowed. Dead is dead right? This same argument is often applied by the massive number of supporters of the .270 Win. and the .30-06 Springfield, no other cartridge is ever needed except for one of these two cartridges. But then the entire industry would collapse because of the lack of commerce.
However, when we keep the comparison intact, you will find that through some reloading you can achieve an additional 200 FPS increase using the the .340 WBY Mag over the .338 Win. Mag. With that increase comes a 500 ft/lb. increase in energy on target. This is using the same length barrel and bullet, obviously using different powders since the .338 Win. Mag. has an 86 grain capacity while the .340 WBY has a 100 grain capacity.
Don't forget to take into account an individual's desire to try something different. Often when asked why a shooters chose a particular cartridge, the reply is 'just because I wanted to' and that is a perfectly good answer. There is no better justification.
Best.