In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

GOING TO FAR?...YOU DECIDE...

n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
edited January 2007 in General Discussion
High school to test for students' weekend drinking
By Associated Press


Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - Updated: 05:31 AM EST

PEQUANNOCK, N.J. - Some teenagers who drink over the weekend could be in big trouble come Monday morning: A New Jersey school district plans to institute random urine tests capable of detecting whether alcohol was consumed up to 80 hours earlier.

Pequannock Township High, with about 800 students, said it will begin administering the tests next Monday.

"This is a major issue for America," School Superintendent Larrie Reynolds said Tuesday. "There are more kids that die each year in alcohol-related traffic deaths than there are soldiers who have died in Iraq. The numbers are staggering."



At least one other New Jersey high school, in Middletown, employs the EtG test, which screens for ethyl glucuronide, a substance produced by the body when it metabolizes alcohol.

Pequannock teenagers who participate in sports or other extracurricular activities, or drive to school, are already tested for illegal drugs, under a 2005 program prompted by the heroin overdose of a student.

Students who test positive for alcohol will not be kicked off teams or barred from extracurricular activities. Instead they will receive counseling and their parents will be notified, Reynolds said.

"That's going to give our kids riding in the back seat of someone's car a very powerful reason to say no," he said.

Drug tests, similarly, can detect drug use that occurred days earlier.

The new test worries civil-liberties advocates and others who oppose school drug testing as an invasion of privacy.

"Medical care and treatment are issues between parents and children," said Deborah Jacobs, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey.

They also say that common household products such as mouthwash can produce a positive test result. Reynolds said that the test has been recalibrated so that for students to test positive, they would generally have to consume one or two drinks.

The EtG test costs about $20, Reynolds said. The school's overall testing program is funded by a three-year, $120,000 federal grant.

"No one's really taking it seriously. If you want to go to a party, you're still going to go to a party," senior Matt Huber said.

c Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


My two cents worth....There are some parents who will allow a teenager to consume a glass of wine with dinner,..what happens there?....
I can understand if it was during school hours, or at a school function, but weekends are your own time, or should be....I dont think kids should be drinking but this is going to far...If you have glass of wine at a home on a saturday night, it can be picked up on the test Monday morning....

Comments

  • Options
    fishermanbenfishermanben Member Posts: 15,370
    edited November -1
    Now I know this is a novel idea, but I wonder what would happen if they spent the schools' money on educational materials?

    Ben
  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well, I advise to skip communion Sunday . It only takes one student to stand up and say NO. After they are kicked out of school all **** will break loose. State is responsible to educate the student. What kind of tests next?
  • Options
    GUNFUNCOGUNFUNCO Member Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think it is their business to teach, not to analyze my kid...unless he has alcohol on his breath or is obviously intoxicated-it is none of their business.

    I will do the parenting in MY house-I don't need a teacher to be telling me how to raise my kids. Plus it is a huge waste of MY tax money!
  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Next test will be for powder residue. Did the student fire a gun over the weekend. Or how about a hair folical test. Maybe a student did drugs over the weekend.
  • Options
    PATBUZZARDPATBUZZARD Member Posts: 3,556
    edited November -1
    It is not the schools job to test for such things. When will the sheeple of this country draw the line?
  • Options
    ZUKEBABYZUKEBABY Member Posts: 450 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    The problem is the growing amount of parents that do NOT do the parenting at home and think it is the job of the schools.
  • Options
    n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Pequannock teenagers who participate in sports or other extracurricular activities, or drive to school, are already tested for illegal drugs, under a 2005 program prompted by the heroin overdose of a student.

    I cant help but wonder if the teachers are tested?....hmmmmmmm
  • Options
    Slow_HandSlow_Hand Member Posts: 2,835
    edited November -1
    Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Given that so many kids are underachieving academically, it might behoove the schools to look at their own shortcomings and leave parenting to the parents. If a child is presumed to be hung over by a teacher on a Monday morning, then call that kid's parents and discuss it directly with them, not hand out P-cups at random.
  • Options
    gun_runnergun_runner Member Posts: 8,999
    edited November -1
    Bad idea, typical liberal naziism
  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I don't have a problem testing students for sport participation. Testing teachers is rediculous. They are adults. Where testing students and alcohol don't mix is when the State or county social services step in to take the student out of the home. BTW, the parent will have to sign a consent form for any testing.
  • Options
    n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Testing teachers is rediculous. They are adults


    It is??????

    What about testing pilots?... RIDICULOUS?.. THe students are already testing for ILLEGAL drugs, why not the teachers?...Teachers under the influence can cause the same accidents, do the same damage as a teen....and in fact they could do more considering they are in control of a room full of students...what is good for the students should be done to the teachers as well....how many of them use illegal drugs?...and how many are hung over on Monday?....its been proven that driving with a hangover is as bad and as dangerous as being drunk...so there is no diff if you are a student or a teen..
  • Options
    GUNFUNCOGUNFUNCO Member Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Black roses-I agree!
  • Options
    PC800PC800 Member Posts: 1,650 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If they test students, they need to test teachers and every other adult in the school system. Who knows how many of those teachers are functional alcoholics and are driving to school drunk every day? I know we had a few in our school like that. The same goes for the schools that are putting the kids' weight on their report cards. Those schools should be required to weigh all the teachers to see how many of them are too fat. Then all this crap would stop.
  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    A Teacher works under a State License. If their superior gets a complaint from someone they can be put on suspension until a formal hearing to determine if their is suffiecient grounds for dismissal. Let a teacher come to school drunk and see how long they get to teach.

    Airline Pilots have random test done to protect the airlines and the people who fly on their planes. People going thru flight school know these rules exist to become Pilots.

    Many companies today random drug test. They WEED OUT the inferior employee's .


    Any State employee of SC can be requested to take a drug test. IF they refuse they can be suspended or possibly lose all their retirement..
  • Options
    ObiWanObiWan Member Posts: 1,054 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thaz New Joysey for ya.

    Claim to be Jewish and that it's a religious belief to drink an alcoholic beverage and turn around and sue the school district. Win Multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit that sux tax payers dollars from real school programs.

    How many kids will slam cold medicine to fail this pee test to get out of school?
  • Options
    n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    A teacher is no different than any other adult....there are alcoholics and drug addicts in every occupation...and if they are going to test the students, then test the teachers as well...


    quote:Airline Pilots have random test done to protect the airlines and the people who fly on their planes

    And I would want the teachers tested to protect my kids....and other kids who go to the school..
  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    You don't have a say whether the teacher gets tested. The State does.
  • Options
    AlpineAlpine Member Posts: 15,059 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Why is it these big cities come up with these knot head ideas?

    I don't understand the reasoning behind putting forth such an insane idea.
    ?The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.?
    Margaret Thatcher

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
    Mark Twain
  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I see this whole fiasco testing the students leading down a long path. The schools will have a reason to claim test scores are not proficient. Parents have to give consent for the students to be tested. Let the schools do something without the parents consent and see what happens.
  • Options
    KodiakkKodiakk Member Posts: 5,582
    edited November -1
    So not only do you have to take a piss test to get a job, now you have to take a piss test to go to school. Complete crap and I would refuse to let my child be tested. Its none of their damn business.
  • Options
    dheffleydheffley Member Posts: 25,000
    edited November -1
    It's the parents job to test the kids, and I would like to see a few of the teachers tested instead.[}:)]
  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Your Teachers in SC must submit fingerprint cards and have a background check done, take a State Mandated knowledge test for the job. After going to college to earn the degree to teach it would only take a fool to foul up and lose it all.
  • Options
    tysonagreentysonagreen Member Posts: 857 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Is there any couch medicine left that actually has alcohol in it? I know dayquil and robitusin dont.

    quote:Originally posted by ObiWan
    Thaz New Joysey for ya.

    Claim to be Jewish and that it's a religious belief to drink an alcoholic beverage and turn around and sue the school district. Win Multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit that sux tax payers dollars from real school programs.

    How many kids will slam cold medicine to fail this pee test to get out of school?
  • Options
    1911a1-fan1911a1-fan Member Posts: 51,193 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    what's next you ask?

    virginity, under age sex is illegal, but i guess it would be ok if your gay

    actually never heard of a alcohol test that works for 80 hours after consumption, ether way their just preparing the next generation for more control
  • Options
    oldgunneroldgunner Member Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Dang democruds at work again. It just makes me feel tired. They won't be happy until they have an inspector beside your bed at night to be sure you get on top and don't smile too broadly..
  • Options
    Jacob2008Jacob2008 Member Posts: 19,528 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I wouldnt mind it, I dont care, because i dont plan on drinking.

    HOWEVER, you have to be 21 to drink, most highschoolers arent 21, so it might be a good thing
  • Options
    n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    There are some high school students who are 17 18 even 19....there are families who let their children drink wine with a meal, is that the schools concern?
  • Options
    stanmanstanman Member Posts: 3,052
    edited November -1
    The schools hand out condoms and will introduce your daughter to an abortion provider without your knowledge or consent.
    I don't hear the ACLU or the other bleeding hearts on the forum crying about that!
  • Options
    agloreaglore Member Posts: 6,012
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Jacob2008
    I wouldnt mind it, I dont care, because i dont plan on drinking.

    HOWEVER, you have to be 21 to drink, most highschoolers arent 21, so it might be a good thing


    In Alaska it is legal for minors to consume alcoholic beverages in their own home if it was given too them by their parents.
  • Options
    jbc23060jbc23060 Member Posts: 499 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    WOW! I was reading this thread and the story popped up on the news. Needless to say, the liberal media ONLY interviewed parents whao were IN FAVOR of the program. We just had three teenagers killed and one who killed another person, in drunk driving accidents over the holidays. These tests would not have stopped any of these tragedies. It is not the governments place to test ESPECIALLY without EXPRESS WRITTEN consent from all parents. Next will be the test for tobacco residue to find out if the PARENTS smoked over the weekend. It doesn't end.
  • Options
    joeaf1911a1joeaf1911a1 Member Posts: 2,962 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Quote: " Now I know this is a novel idea, but I wonder what would happen if they spent the schools' money on educational materials?"
    Ben: You dont seem to realize that education in schools is a secondary thing in the past 20 years. Diversity, sex education, paid counslers for trauma, and the likes are evidentaly much more important than education. Parents dont want to be bothered teaching their kids
    on these things. However, more teachers, bigger Teachers Unions, and
    more local taxes rank first. Not just plain education. That is a thing from the past as we knew it.
  • Options
    oldgunneroldgunner Member Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    My kids are all bossing me now, but when I was in charge, I would let them (three of them) share a beer now and then, at home, no guests..However, I also gave them a permission slip to see R rated movies on our military base. At that time, it was still the parent's job to raise the kids, not the courts and school boards.

    I guess we did ok..I have one head nurse in a retirement home, one LEO (she isn't a street cop, she's in charge of the computer system), and one law professor who teaches at Georgetown University in Washington.

    My wife and I were guardedly tolerant. We didn't weave any "cabbage leaf or stork" tales, we discussed..anything and everything..that the girls were curious about. They got the truth, always, and they were treated with respect. They were guided, but not preached to.

    Now we have no drunks, no dropouts, no druggies, no troubled offspring.

    Some of it was luck..no..we were blessed..Some of it was treating our children like people, some of it maybe was heredity.

    Most important of all, there was trust. Sometimes that's hard, certainly. Especially when your youngest daughter goes off to college and tells you about the drinking parties etc. I'll never forget how I worried..But I restrained myself, my wife (ex by then) did the same, we kept treating her as a young adult, mature enough to make some decisions for herself. My hair turned gray, but it didn't fall out..And we all got through it. I'm very proud of them now, and I was then.

    Trouble happens when they're left to the school system and the government to raise. Parents who do that (most now unfortunately) get drop outs, druggies, prostitutes, drive by shooters, gang bangers, and life time dependants as a reward.

    There's a fine line between permissiveness and despotism that works. It's worth the trouble to find the line. The most important thing to remember, in my opinion (I use that phrase almost every day on here) is to treat your children like people but not like adults. That is until they prove to you that they ARE adults. Then leave them the He** alone to make their own decisions. By this time, they probably know a lot more about life than you do. And guess what..They will be responsible, they will be honest, and they will still respect you. Mine still say "sir" when they talk to me, and never once did I tell them to or suggest it. They do it out of respect. Respect that they learned for themselves, not anything forced on them by despots OR teachers.
  • Options
    Jacob2008Jacob2008 Member Posts: 19,528 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by BlackRoses
    There are some high school students who are 17 18 even 19....there are families who let their children drink wine with a meal, is that the schools concern?


    True, never thought about that

    I doubt it is, but if their hardcore drinking.. I would be concerned if the parents knew, Maybe if they had the parent sign a thing that says "do you want us to test your son/daughter
  • Options
    Jacob2008Jacob2008 Member Posts: 19,528 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by aglore
    quote:Originally posted by Jacob2008
    I wouldnt mind it, I dont care, because i dont plan on drinking.

    HOWEVER, you have to be 21 to drink, most highschoolers arent 21, so it might be a good thing


    In Alaska it is legal for minors to consume alcoholic beverages in their own home if it was given too them by their parents.
    [url][/url]

    As i stated with BR, It would prolly be fine as long as the parents signed a thingy that said "NO i dont want my kid to be tested" but some parents might be concerned. Oh well, id like to hear how the law goes, pass / fail
Sign In or Register to comment.