In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Your duck/skeet guns ARE NOT COVERED...never having been used in war. Nor has your .22 rifle.
You boys need to grow a pair....or just give your firearms to the authorities and save them the necessity of taking them.
You might want to do a bit more research on your statement. I'd be willing to bet that duck/skeet guns HAVE been used in armed conflict (war). And .22 rifles were used in Viet Nam.
Is (was) a Pennsylvania or Kentucky Rifle considered a "weapon"?
quote:iceracerx Posted - 12/01/2008 : 1:09:27 PM
You might want to do a bit more research on your statement. I'd be willing to bet that duck/skeet guns HAVE been used in armed conflict (war). And .22 rifles were used in Viet Nam.
I understand that, Iceracerx..and it is obvious that YOU do...but those stoutly maintaining that they own no 'weapons' don't.
Comments
Your duck/skeet guns ARE NOT COVERED...never having been used in war. Nor has your .22 rifle.
You boys need to grow a pair....or just give your firearms to the authorities and save them the necessity of taking them.
You might want to do a bit more research on your statement. I'd be willing to bet that duck/skeet guns HAVE been used in armed conflict (war). And .22 rifles were used in Viet Nam.
Is (was) a Pennsylvania or Kentucky Rifle considered a "weapon"?
You might want to do a bit more research on your statement. I'd be willing to bet that duck/skeet guns HAVE been used in armed conflict (war). And .22 rifles were used in Viet Nam.
I understand that, Iceracerx..and it is obvious that YOU do...but those stoutly maintaining that they own no 'weapons' don't.
Therefore..I intend worrying them a bit.
Did not expect to touch so many nerves.
Bill Jordan
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than to have a frontal lobotomy."