In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

What would you do?.....

RembrandtRembrandt Member Posts: 4,486 ✭✭
edited September 2002 in General Discussion
Say your a gun dealer and someone fits a particular terrorist or gang profile....and wants to buy large quantities of ammo and guns. All their papers check out....how would you handle it?
«1

Comments

  • Big Sky RedneckBig Sky Redneck Member Posts: 19,752 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I would make the sale and then as soon as they walk out of my store I would make a phone call. Refusing to make the sale could create trouble in the store and I would want to avoid that.
  • nunnnunn Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 36,085 ******
    edited November -1
    Only had it happen once. At a gun show, this skinhead wants to buy a gun. Arms are all tattooed with swastikas and white power. I refused him and told him to go on. He did without a fuss. I suppose he had gotten used to it.

    Another time, before Brady, a man from a Central American country known for political unrest picked out 6 used Smith & Wesson revolvers.
    He checked out fine, so I sold him the guns and sent in a multiple form on the sale. He didn't say whether he intended to export the guns, and I didn't ask. Figured that was between him and Customs.

    SIG pistol armorer/FFL Dealer/Full time Peace Officer, Moderator of General Discussion Board on Gunbroker. Visit www.gunbroker.com, the best gun auction site on the Net! Email davidnunn@texoma.net
  • nunnnunn Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 36,085 ******
    edited November -1
    I understand what you are saying, but I just can't stand racism. I believe that I have the right to refuse to sell to anyone as long as my refusal is not based on his race, sex, age, religion, or national origin. I just exercised my right, that's all.

    I like for my guns to go to good homes.

    SIG pistol armorer/FFL Dealer/Full time Peace Officer, Moderator of General Discussion Board on Gunbroker. Visit www.gunbroker.com, the best gun auction site on the Net! Email davidnunn@texoma.net
  • LowriderLowrider Member Posts: 6,587
    edited November -1
    Would you have refused a sale to some home boy with "black power" tattoos? If so, then YOU'D have been accused of racism.

    Lord Lowrider the LoquaciousMember:Secret Select Society of Suave Stylish Smoking Jackets She was only a fisherman's daughter,But when she saw my rod she reeled.
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'd be interested in knowing what "fitting a particular terrorist or gang profile" means, and whether this is enough to deny sales to otherwise qualified (legal) buyers.
  • dheffleydheffley Member Posts: 25,000
    edited November -1
    The law is the Law, and every man must define his own moral standards. "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" is a legitimate reason for me. Each to his own. There sometimes is a thin line between capitalism and greed. IMHO

    Save, research, then buy the best.Join the NRA, NOW!Teach them young, teach them safe, teach them forever, but most of all, teach them to VOTE!
  • cowdoccowdoc Member Posts: 5,847 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    that sound a little funny to me Rembrant who goes into a gun store and wants to buy large quantites of ammo and guns at onetime when they fit a profile? if it is somebody who does criminal acts with these purchases.....its just one more blow to my right to own guns as a law abbiding citizen. i think i would let proper law enforcement know.
    doc
  • dads-freeholddads-freehold Member Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    greetings, gentelmen that is the diffinition of profiling and could get you into serious trouble in some circles. ofcourse i say go with your gut, but if your wrong be a man about it. i say that because there have been people whose live have been screwed by unsubstanciated accusations. like that fella at the worlds fair. respt submitted dads-freehold

    if your going to be a savage, be a headhunter
  • robsgunsrobsguns Member Posts: 4,581 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    No disrespect to anyone who has participated in this thread, but I'll throw my .02 worth in. I dont care what you call it, anytime you think someone is up to no good, and do what you think is best, based on what ever information you glean either from their personal appearance, outside sources, or personal observation of their actions, you are doing the right thing, and in the U.S. agencies around the world they call it numerous things, but I call it 'politics of a personal nature'. The CIA calls it an information source, as does the FBI and some media sources. What ever, the U.S. refuses sales and makes down right boycotts on countries all the time because of that countries political stance, or military agendas. If its good enough for our commander in chief, and other leaders of our country to do, then its good enough for me, by God! Go with your gut instincts, dont be a racist, dont be prejudice against appearances, use your common sense, and its not profiling, it is self preservation, and looking out for the good of the country in this particular instance, enough said. Ryan

    Oh yeah, what I would have done would be to have started asking a lot of questions, and told him right up front that I thought it strange, and even though some people might be offended at the questions, I'm asking them of you, and if you have a problem with it you can take your business down the street, because I will not be part of anyone being harmed due to my ignorance.

    SSgt Ryan E. Roberts, USMC

    Edited by - robsguns on 09/15/2002 16:54:31
  • NighthawkNighthawk Member Posts: 12,022 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Im asking this in the form of a question?Dont gun Dealers have the right to refuse to sale to anyone.Even if their a Law abideing citizen?

    Rugster


    Toujours Pret
  • AlpineAlpine Member Posts: 15,092 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Yes. And there is nothing wrong with profiling. If you think it to be illegal, please tell me what law you think is being broken. If you are talking civil, forget it, you can be sued for anything, and it does not have to make sense.

    "If you ain't got pictures, I wasn't there."
    ?The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.?
    Margaret Thatcher

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
    Mark Twain
  • RembrandtRembrandt Member Posts: 4,486 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Probably should explain why I pose the question....this last week a lady overhears some middle eastern men talking about "something in Miami"...she calls the authorities and reports the matter, and you know the rest. After 9/11 the President asks all citizens to be vigilant and watching for things that might look suspicious or questionable. Prior to 9/11 most gun dealers wouldn't have given the original senario a second thought....I know my antenna would be raised now....just curious what others thought.
  • cowdoccowdoc Member Posts: 5,847 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    that was a good question Rembrant.....we as gun owners or gun dealers have the resonsibility to see that our guns dont fall into hands of people who would use them for crime or prevent children from getting ahold of gun and kill another child by accident ectect.
    Could you imagine what would happen to our gun rights as we know them now if a terrorist managed to buy a bunch of guns and ammo at the hometown legitimate gun dealer and killed many many people with them!
    I would bet that every gun dealer in the USA would have it's doors nailed shut by the ATF and all the guns and ect taken away.
    And as far as profiling we all fit a profile of some sort.
    and far as profiling goes toward terrorists....IT WAS'NT WHITE 20-40 YR OLD FARM BOYS HIGHJACKING PLANES AND FLYING PLANES INTO BUILDINGS.
    Doc
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It is interesting to see the hypocritical stance taken by some in this thread, who would deliberately hinder another citizen's ability to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights by refusing them sale of arms based on what they alone have determined would be "good for the country".
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    rugster --
    I have to laugh, because the gun dealers I know are more than anxious to sell, sell, sell. Reserve the right to refuse to sell? Baahahaha!

    But they are also very up on the law around here and will start treating you like a dunce if you ask a lot of stupid questions about buying illegal stuff. They are not willing to risk their FFL on a bad sale.

    If a guy fits a certain description and buys multiple guns & ammo, I would say the curse is taken off me as a dealer by the fact that a multiple purchase form has to be filled out in any case. If I felt the need to make a call and urge that a particular form not be passed over too quickly, I would not hesitate to do so. If it smells, I'm going to be a good citizen. And I don't mean turning in a basically good American for shaving the law on a folding stock for self protection. I'm talking about turning in Osama for buying a dozen black rifles, a lot of ammo and a whole lot of solvents and primers, for example. But then, I don't have an FFL anyway. If I did, and I were obeying the letter of the law, I would not be allowed to sell the American the folder, maybe, but I would not be breaking the law in some states by selling the arsenal to Osama. That's a bit backward in spirit, and I would want to make up for the law's lack of foresight by suggesting a little well placed attention from LEOs to confirm that the buy was harmless.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • robsgunsrobsguns Member Posts: 4,581 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    DancesWithSheep,
    I want to address your post, since I feel it is probably directed towards my comment, if its not, I'll address it anyway, because I feel the shoe fits.
    Your post as follows:It is interesting to see the hypocritical stance taken by some in this thread, who would deliberately hinder another citizen's ability to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights by refusing them sale of arms based on what they alone have determined would be "good for the country".
    First the word that irritates me is hypocritical. I am not hypocritical, nor do I believe are others who think like me on this thread. As far as I know we all believe that selling guns to criminals, would be criminals/terrorists, or people that clearly demonstrate they pose a threat to others based on information about them is wrong. I am not a hypocrite, I have always believed that, and always will. I believe in my 2nd amendment rights to keep and bear arms, but I do not believe everyone has that right once they have demonstrated to the contrary, I have always believed that, and always stated that. Some people shouldnt be allowed to breathe let alone have a firearm, I dont care what the constitution states. That doesnt make me a hypocrite, that makes me someone who can think, someone that can interpret the law, and use common sense to prevent someone from getting hold of a gun that should never have had one in the first place. Just as you dont let a child molestor baby sit for you, you also do not give a gun to a person who fits the description in every way shape and form of a dangerous person. Can I and do I feel competent and intelligent enough to do what is best for the country?, you bet your butt I do, and you better hope there are more people like me, because if you think anyone is better qualafied to judge a gun owner than another gun owner, you are wrong. I will not let anyone tell me I am not informed enough to know what is good for this country, period, because I do know, believe me. I know that putting everyones second amendment right first and foremost above all else without using any logical reasoning behind who you are allowing to have that gun is only the logic of an idiot. That is what I call stupid. This is not hypocritical, it is smart, and common sense. Trying to cover everyone with the second amendment right as if its a protective blanket, well, that time has gone. That is what will have all of us stripped of our second amendment rights, defending every scum's right to have one, so that he can do something stupid with his right, thats stupid. Be that as it may, this is just me exercising my right to freedom of speech. You have your opinion of what you think is a hypocrite, and I have my opinion of what is intelligent and what is purely stupid thinking.

    SSgt Ryan E. Roberts, USMC

    Edited by - robsguns on 09/15/2002 23:53:11
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    robsguns:

    I suggest that this from your original post:

    "I dont care what you call it, anytime you think someone is up to no good, and do what you think is best, based on what ever information you glean either from their personal appearance, outside sources, or personal observation of their actions, you are doing the right thing..."

    ...and this from your last post:

    "As far as I know we all believe that selling guns to criminals, would be criminals/terrorists, or people that clearly demonstrate they pose a threat to others based on information about them..."

    ...so dilutes and so changes and so back-pedals from your original criteria that further argument is unnecessary. And the fact is, given even your revised criteria, the likes of Timothy McVey would walk out of your store with a smile and an armload of guns.





    Edited by - DancesWithSheep on 09/15/2002 23:13:39
  • robsgunsrobsguns Member Posts: 4,581 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    DancesWithSheep,
    You are obviously very confused over what I stated in my post, and even taken out of context, it can not be construed to mean that I ever said anything different in my second post that I previously stated in my first post. I also make it quite clear that under no circumstances would I sell to anyone if I thought them to be dangerous with a gun, meaning they might use it to harm others. What post are you reading?? Could T.M. possibly make it into a gun shop and out if his papers checked out, most likely, because from what I've seen of him before his death, he didnt fit anyone's idea of a dangerous person through his appearance, so that statement you made about him, would be correct. There is nothing anyone can do about people like him getting guns, because he is the type that has no record until hes done his deed. That is no reflection on any dealer, thats just how it is.

    I see that in my first post I left out two key words from a sentence that you quoted. I've since corrected that sentence in the last two words to read, 'is wrong'. You should have been able to figure that out, as that sentence made no sense without those 2 words inserted at the end. Typo, shame on me. The entire first post and second post clearly express a disdain for anyone selling guns to someone who should not have a gun, either from your own gut feeling, or judgement of that person to be dangerous at that time. Nothing hypocritical going on in this thread, from anyone. I stand by my words, the 2nd amendment may be a constitutional right, but I wont just give it away to everyone if I ever get a license to sell, the sale be damned. If more people exercised good judgement and common sense we would not be where we are today. The fact that Rembrandt asked this question is a credit to him, as most people wouldnt even care, they'd just take the money.

    SSgt Ryan E. Roberts, USMC

    Edited by - robsguns on 09/16/2002 00:01:19
  • BoomerangBoomerang Member Posts: 4,513
    edited November -1
    DWS - Based on the following scenario, I have a question for you. If a guy comes up to you and wants to buy a gun from you, and your gut (your sixth sense) is telling you that this fellow is up to no good, (it could be his demeanor, his words, his actions, or even his outward appearance) would you sell him a gun and all the ammo he could carry? This is a question that only needs a YES or NO answer.

    I know what I would do, and I think that is where Ryan is coming from in his post.

    Boomer

    "Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as it is by the obstacles which one has overcome while trying to succeed."NRA Life Member
  • robsgunsrobsguns Member Posts: 4,581 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hey if this arguement gets good, I'm sorry, I gotta get some sleep, talk with you all later. DWS, throwing around opinions is good fun, dont take anything personal, I'm highly opinionated and verbal.

    SSgt Ryan E. Roberts, USMC
  • BoomerangBoomerang Member Posts: 4,513
    edited November -1
    DWS - That is not an answer. Like or dislike has nothing to do with my scenario. Still waiting, YES or NO.

    Boomer

    "Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as it is by the obstacles which one has overcome while trying to succeed."NRA Life Member
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Boomer:

    Sorry, I didn't see your post. NO, I wouldn't. But what gives me the feeling in my gut is individualized, and not based on any profile or set criteria.



    Edited by - DancesWithSheep on 09/16/2002 00:26:23
  • BoomerangBoomerang Member Posts: 4,513
    edited November -1
    Exactly, I can not speak for Ryan, but I think that is what he was getting at. You and I may not call it or know it as profiling, but in a way your gut has a set of criteria that makes the hair on your neck stand up. This is just natural/learned human instinct to know when things are no right.

    Boomer

    "Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as it is by the obstacles which one has overcome while trying to succeed."NRA Life Member
  • guns-n-painthorsesguns-n-painthorses Member Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Wow! Man, I have to chime in on this one. So, based only on looks and gut feelings, some people would deny a legal sale to a legal American.
    I think that sucks! That's the same sh#t that got us the assault weapons ban, cuz you know, that protruding hand grip and flash hider make the gun bad. What, are you going to look into a crystal ball from now on to see what a buyer might do with a gun sometime after the sale? Good luck! I hope we won't all have to look like Mr. Clever to buy guns now!


    Got Guns?
  • BoomerangBoomerang Member Posts: 4,513
    edited November -1
    guns-n-painthorses - No, you have missed the point on this one. This has nothing to do with the way a gun looks. Democrats believe you can assign evil to a gun. Only people can be evil or good.

    So, let me get this straight, you are saying you would knowlingly sell a gun to someone you think would probably use it to commit a crime. Yes or no.

    Boomer



    "Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as it is by the obstacles which one has overcome while trying to succeed."NRA Life Member
  • guns-n-painthorsesguns-n-painthorses Member Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well, if the guy checks out, Make the sell.
    I can't believe you guys are saying that based on YOUR feelings, you can tell who should, and should not have a gun. Besides, thugs get guns off the street, not from judgemental(sp) dealers who think they know everything about a person by the way he looks or acts. Besides, "reserving the right to refuse service to anyone" based on looks or feelings truly borders on racisim.

    Got Guns?
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I don't believe in profiling based on any single factor, like race. If, however, I see someone walk into the gun shop that has a range of traits that add up to a bad risk, I don't think that's profiling. That's common sense. That's keeping your wits about you. Don't assume that I focus on one trait, because I definitely don't; but don't expect me to put blinders on either. The more red flags you raise, the more likely you add up to someone who makes people nervous. That's natural. It would be unnatural to expect people to act otherwise, especially now. If you get your kicks by looking and acting in accordance with people's expectations of a terrorist, expect to pay consequences now and then for that "freedom."


    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    g&p: I think what is being said now is not who should and who should not have a gun, but who we would or would not sell a gun to.
  • Matt45Matt45 Member Posts: 3,185
    edited November -1
    I can see the validity of both side of this argument-

    (And I hope to he!! this makes sense, 'cause I'm really tired)

    Nobody wants to be indirectly responsible for, (even if they were not suspect of the buyer at the time), supporting a terrorist activity.

    Most all of us here feel VERY strongly about our 2nd Amendment rights, and a strong resilience against the further restriction or loss of these rights.


    We WILL lose ground if terrorists ever obtain arms and ammo through the same sources you and I use. No doubt about it.

    The solution, as I see it, is somewheres in the middle- Why not do something in the middle- If the guy is suspect to you, but doesn't seem all kinds of wrong, just a little peculier(SP), why not tell the guy his NICS check was not a proceed, and is a "hold". More than likely, if he's a honest citizen, he'll return in three days.

    If he REALLY gives you a slimy feeling, and I mean a deep-down warning klaxon in the pit of yer guts- do one of two things. Refuse the sale- That's your right as a private citizen, sorry, there's another gunstore down the road, or tell him it's a "hold" on the NICS, and the moment he leaves, drop a dime. You might say I'm promoting an agent network for the feds or whatever, but like CowDoc said-quote: IT WAS'NT WHITE 20-40 YR OLD FARM BOYS HIGHJACKING PLANES AND FLYING PLANES INTO BUILDINGS.

    Yeah the McVey argument is compelling, but, just like what was stated, you'll never know 'til he snaps and it's done. I guess in a free country like this, you gotta take your chances and occasionlly encrouch on personal freedoms and liberties, yeah, we do hand a "win" to the anti-gunners if you refuse the sale, but it's better than helping someone to perpetrate a crime because you can't see the forest for the trees.


    Reserving my Right to Arm Bears!!!!

    Edited by - Matt45 on 09/16/2002 18:10:44
  • robsgunsrobsguns Member Posts: 4,581 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    gnph,
    The only thing you need to do is put yourself in a parents position as I said earlier. If you wouldnt hire a guy or girl to baby sit for you based on your gut feeling and that is the smart thing to go with, you can definitely apply that same reasoning to selling a gun to anyone. The bottom line here is that if you sell that gun to that guy, he doesnt need to be a terrorist, he might just be the guy to go kidnap your child. As a parent I think a lot differently than I use to, and now I put everything into the perspective of, 'Is it going to possibly harm my child?' My gut feeling is what I go with, from my guns in the house being loaded or unloaded, to the way I think on environmental issues. Selling a gun to someone who by my gut feeling doesnt sit well with me, is not something I'm going to do either, and its not nearly as important to me as my child.

    SSgt Ryan E. Roberts, USMC
  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Don't know anyone in the business of selling anything who wants to turn down sales. OTOH, long before 9/11, I've seen dealers just say no to individuals who seemed pretty flakey to me as an objective (I believe) observer of the attempted purchase. This was pre-NICS. Most folks feel a moral obligation to society. No discrimination being advocated here. And I doubt there are many even in the firearms community who are stronger supporters of the 2nd Amendment than I. Simply, as Ryan indicated, good common sense.
  • ThePaladinThePaladin Member Posts: 32 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Guy walks into your store and says, "I need a .357 magnum to shoot cans." You take one look at him and ask for a repeat. Same thing, so you try to sell him a .22 or a similiar caliber. Nothing doing. "I need a .357 to shoot cans." In your gut, you know something is wrong, but can't put your finger on it. So the obvious question is " what kind of cans are you going to shoot?
    The reply comes back... AfriCANS, mexiCANS, puertoriCANS, so then you refuse the sale by saying you don't have one.
    A man has to follow his instincts, or we will all suffer.

    Anybody got a .357 for sale? Just kidding
  • ATFATF Member Posts: 11,683 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    offeror,the multiple purchase form is only for handguns.

    ATF
  • Matt45Matt45 Member Posts: 3,185
    edited November -1
    Oops-sorry, I just checked my last post- didn't mean to put the last part in that exaggerated size.

    Ok- fixed.

    Reserving my Right to Arm Bears!!!!
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If bartenders can reserve the right to deny alcohol purchases at their own discretion then the same should apply to gun dealers. The only private sales I have made were to fellow MP's in my unit, the fathers of close friends and a DA. The headache you would get over a few instances of profiling accusations would not compare to the headache you would have after accidentally selling a gun to someone that previously had a clean record because he just managed to get away with everything up to that point. Your gun could be the one he uses the first time he gets caught.
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    idsman75:

    This thread started out asking one question and became clouded by asking another. To use your bartender analogy, the "discretion" at issue is not:

    "Sir, you've had too much to drink and are becoming loud and unruly. You'll have to leave."

    ...it is:

    "Sir, you're a Middle Eastern male between 20-40 years of age. You'll have to leave."

    I suggest that only the first example is discretion.
  • gmayesgmayes Member Posts: 415 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Alot of people may look like gang bangers and are truly good people. I have alot of police friends who when are off duty look like on of the hells angels.
  • sfettysfetty Member Posts: 349 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have my FFL License and if a person of middle eastern descent wanted to buy a firearm from me, they might as well forget it! I know that is profiling and I know that there are many fine middle eastern people in this world and this country. The problem is, which ones are the good ones and which ones are the terrorists. 9/11 certainly caused me to look at middle eastern people more carefully. I hate that I have to be more skeptical of a race of people, but I can't help it. I was the same way when I was in Viet Nam. I looked at ALL Vietnamese as potential VC or NVA. I didn't like it but I made it back home in one piece.If you could have talked to one of the hijackers on 9/11, he probably would have seemed like a pretty nice guy. It's surprising how easily we can be fooled, because most of us want to believe the best of everyone.

    What people do with the firearms I sell them is their business. If my gut feeling is not to sell to someone because I am not sure if their intentions are honorable, thats my business.
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    sfetty: Don't flatter yourself. Profiling has nothing to do with gut feeling; to the contrary, it eliminates the need for such judgment altogether. You are merely infringing on the Second Amendment rights of an entire citizen class for what you happen to think is best for the country.

    Up until now, I didn't realize that having an FFL elevated you to the Judicial branch of the government.
  • sfettysfetty Member Posts: 349 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Danceswithsheep, we all make judgements everyday of our lives. Some are good, some are bad. Having an FFL doesn't change that.

    This government has caused many of the problems we are facing today by allowing our borders to be crossed by anyone from anywhere. Those 9/11 terrorists got into the country and were able to learn to fly aircraft even though this government had intelligence reports months and months before that Al-queda was contimplating using aircraft as bombs on American soil.

    Now that puts me as an FFL dealer in a precarious position. Do I sell a firearm to someone from the middle east that was allowed to come into this country so easily and may or may not be a terrorist. I don't trust my government enough to believe they have effectively checked that person for me to sell them a gun.

    I am a lifetime member of the NRA and will defend our second ammendment rights as long as I live. But until I trust my government to secure our borders, I won't sell a firearm to a middle easterner.
Sign In or Register to comment.