In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

45 cal vs. the 9mm

o.0o.0 Member Posts: 7 ✭✭
edited August 2003 in General Discussion
In this corner.. a .45 cal. monster used by your law inforcement officers. In this corner ... a 9mm used by anyone. Both guns weigh in good with a good record, but! What one wins this bout it? Ive heard over and over by everyone that the .45 cal wins. This can be observed by the prices on gunbroker being that they cost more then the 9mm. But the 9mm isnt that bad of a gun. Depending on what type you got. If you want quality they are still offordable. What would you buy and why?
«1

Comments

  • TOOLS1TOOLS1 Member Posts: 6,133
    edited November -1
    I bought both. Just to be on the safe side.
    TOOLS

    General TOOLS RRG

    Don't go blaming the beer. Hank Hill

    When I was a child, I thought as a child. But now that I am grown, I just wish I could act like a child and get away with it.
  • kingjoeykingjoey Member Posts: 8,636
    edited November -1
    Oh no, don't open this can of worms! Both are good rounds, 9mm's a good SMG round, but for a pistol I gotta go with the 45. [}:)]

    Love them Beavers
    orst-title-1.gif

    SUPPORT THE I.N.S. , THE COUNTRY THEY SAVE COULD BE YOUR OWN
  • agloreaglore Member Posts: 6,012
    edited November -1
    The 45 ACP. Why? Well to quote Cooper, "the 45 makes a big entrance hole to allow lot's of air in and leaves a big exit hole to let lot's of blood out".

    AlleninAlaska
    Delta Firearms & Supplies
    http://canadianfirearmsexchange.com

    Buy firearms on the installment plan and Play while you Pay.

    aglore@gci.net
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    In this instance, caliber has nothing to do with price; you can spend $2K for a production Sig 210 9mm and $6K+ for a Korth or Korriphila 9mm. I choose .45 because I shoot it better than 9mm, regardless of make or model.
  • buckdeerbuckdeer Member Posts: 260 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    danceswithsheep wouldn't a 1911 in 45 be a little harder to shoot than a 1911 in 9mm, 40 S&W, or 38 super.
  • rldowns3rldowns3 Member Posts: 6,096
    edited November -1
    .45acp all the way. I have been shot with one....I personally know how effective they are.

    annoyaliberal.jpgnotmyfault.gif
  • bambihunterbambihunter Member Posts: 10,792 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It depends... The 9mm is definately cheaper to shoot and the .45 has more energy and a larger frontal area for more stopping power. It also would depend on the magazine capacity, and on its use. If both guns were for home protection and both had the now mandatory 10 round magazine, then it'd be a .45 hands down. However, if the gun was used for home protection and the 9mm had a 15 round (or more) and the .45 had 7 (as in the 1911 style) then I'd take the 9mm. In a panic situation one never knows how well they'll shoot.
    However, I'd take the 10mm over both of them for sure - especially in with a pre-ban hi-cap magazine. If you're not familiar with the 10mm, it is ballistically equal or superior (depending on the ammo) to the .357 magnum and can be loaded up to .41 magnum levels. With my Glock 20 and 15 round pre-ban magazines it is basically like having 2 1/2 .357 magnum revolvers. Think about it... Unless you're recoil sensative it is definately the way to go. Another nice feature, especially of the Glock is that you can buy aftermarket barrels that allow you to shoot .40 S&W (or, since the .40 S&W is a 10mm that is shortened by ~ 1/8" and has less powder we call it the .40 Short & Weak) and also the .357 SIG. Just by swapping out the barrels you can shoot 3 different cartridge types.

    Maybe this image will clarify things a bit:

    pistolcartridges.jpg
    Fanatic collector of the 10mm auto.
  • kingjoeykingjoey Member Posts: 8,636
    edited November -1
    Rldowns3- Was that what got you? I didn't remember that part of the story. On the flip side, the 45 Colt isn't exactly a slouch either, right?[;)] I remember hearing someone say about this "You meet a lot of people who've been shot with a 9mm, not that many people get hit with a 45 and live to tell about it."[:0]

    Love them Beavers
    orst-title-1.gif

    SUPPORT THE I.N.S. , THE COUNTRY THEY SAVE COULD BE YOUR OWN
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by buckdeer

    danceswithsheep wouldn't a 1911 in 45 be a little harder to shoot than a 1911 in 9mm, 40 S&W, or 38 super.

    Not for me. And same with the Sig 220.
  • rldowns3rldowns3 Member Posts: 6,096
    edited November -1
    kingjoey, I was shot with a .45acp, yea. I returned the favor with a .45colt in the form of a Taurus Titanium snub nose. Although anything that happened after that I don't remember because I woke up in a hospital.

    annoyaliberal.jpgnotmyfault.gif
  • kingjoeykingjoey Member Posts: 8,636
    edited November -1
    How have you been lately, are you feeling better?

    Love them Beavers
    orst-title-1.gif

    SUPPORT THE I.N.S. , THE COUNTRY THEY SAVE COULD BE YOUR OWN
  • snarlgardsnarlgard Member Posts: 1,310 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    sorry I have to agree with a lot of the others
    To show just how much I have 3 1911a1 of differing brands
    and my fav is a springfield that will hold 14 rounds of 45acp

    Lt. snarlgard RRG
    SMILE...MAKE EM WONDER WHAT YOUR UP TO[}:)]
    fcb9874f.jpg.thumb.jpgfc21ef6c.gif
  • ohioghogohioghog Member Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    i may get some flack on this one but my home defence 9mm with tactical lite loaded with federal hydroshocks is no slouch. and my better half isnt afraid of the recoil.
  • rldowns3rldowns3 Member Posts: 6,096
    edited November -1
    This was a few years ago, and I feel fine now although I still occasionally have minor problems with muscle spasms in my left arm from the nerve damage but it's nothing that isn't manageable....as well as some loss of strength in my hand but I attribute my hand problems from the round that went through the base of the palm of my hand and exited from my wrist joint....that round also sent fragments up through to my elbow....but it's mostly good now I'd say that I am at 95% operating capacity.

    annoyaliberal.jpgnotmyfault.gif
  • kingjoeykingjoey Member Posts: 8,636
    edited November -1
    Good to hear that you're doing good. I always use my left hand for any dangerous things, my left hand is relatively expendable, it'll never have the strength, coordination, or finnesse of my right hand[}:)][:o)][;)]

    Love them Beavers
    orst-title-1.gif

    SUPPORT THE I.N.S. , THE COUNTRY THEY SAVE COULD BE YOUR OWN
  • gunnut505gunnut505 Member Posts: 10,290
    edited November -1
    I'm going to make 2 unwarranted assumptions, insult some of you, and then make my point.

    Assumption 1- The debate refers to stopping ability instead of accuracy.

    Assumption 2- The poster is confused as to what round is currently in use by our Armed Forces

    In my mind, and for my own reasons; Anyone that would pit the .45ACP against the Yurrapeein' 9 MILLIMETER (You'reup=Metric)caliber has to have been living in a hole for the last 20 years, and hasn't heard about the .357Sig, 40 Smilin' & Whompin', or the 400 Cor-Bon, .50AE, .41AE, or that round the FBI had to tone down for the ladies: the 10mm (it just SOUNDS Yurripian, right?).

    My point is that just because some Military Contractor greased the right palms to hustle his piece of ordnance to the Guys On The Ground; that shouldn't become a consideration for the Civilian population when seeking reliable self defense hardware.
    I've always been impressed with the 357Sig's and the .40's handling characteristics, even with Full-house handloads. Both are capable of outstopping the .45/9mm, are easier to hold due to recoil not being as stiff (lots of polymer, alloy, etc. frames out there sacrifice weight for recoil adsorption ability-short barrels don't help either), and are considered "Death Rays" by the Texas Rangers & New Mexico State Police that carry them daily.
    I have to question (in all my wisdumb) why price would be a factor(within the "under $500" range) when choosing a defensive sidearm, and then picking the cheaper and smaller one because it's cheaper and smaller.

    As far as accuracy, I've owned several different .45's, and couldn't hit myself in the foot with 'em! I still have a few 9's (Hi-Point, Sig, Browning, Kel-Tec, Llama, Ruger...)because they shoot to point of aim, or at least in the same direction I point 'em, and they'll go 100yds. without having to aim above the target frame.

    Hope I helped some die-hard ACP fans to see my POV.

    If you know it all; you must have been listening.WEAR EAR PROTECTION!
  • Henry0ReillyHenry0Reilly Member Posts: 10,892 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Not to beat a dead horse too much, but the best firearm/caliber for any given individual is the weapon that the individual can employ to the greatest effect. I absolutely would not hesitate to encourage someone to carry a .22 if that was the most potent caliber they could handle effectively.
    I own a 1911 clone in .45 but my usual carry gun is a revolver. My early experience with malfunctioning automatics and even clip fed rifles makes me put my faith in the practically infallible wheelgun.

    Remember Ruby Ridge.
    I used to recruit for the NRA until they sold us down the river (again!) in Heller v. DC. See my auctions (if any) under username henryreilly
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by gunnut505

    I still have a few 9's...they'll go 100yds. without having to aim above the target frame.

    Are you down to stems and seeds again?
  • dheffleydheffley Member Posts: 25,000
    edited November -1
    Old jarheads carry .45 ACP's.[}:)]

    By the way, welcome.[:D]

    Measure twice, cut once.
    calipers_open_close_md_wht.gif
    Empty the clip!
    smoking_gun_md_wht.gif
  • bambihunterbambihunter Member Posts: 10,792 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by gunnut505

    or that round the FBI had to tone down for the ladies: the 10mm (it just SOUNDS Yurripian, right?).


    gunnut505, I think you're confused... It isn't the 10mm that was "toned down for the ladies". It was the .40 S&W that was the directly derived from first reducing the power from the 10mm and eventually shortening the case to fit into most 9mm/.45 sized-frame guns. I'll agree with you on the .40 S&W and .357 SIG being excellent cartridges too (that's why I mentioned the barrel swap capability on the Glocks).
    I no longer own either the 9mm or the .45 ACP, but I wish I still had the 9mm for relatively cheap plinking. I guess that task was relegated to one of my .22lr's now.

    o.O - In my humble opinion, the prices of .45's are typically higher than 9mm's because they typically are heavier/bigger guns that require more resources to make.
    Fanatic collector of the 10mm auto.
  • Night StalkerNight Stalker Member Posts: 11,967
    edited November -1
    Rldowns3,

    Man I have to tell you that I have been through several conflicts in support of our great nation and never taken a round. I can not imagine getting hit by a .45 in any of the extremities. Have seen the end result more than once, and that assured me I never wanted to be on that end..... EVER! Hope it was worth it!

    NSDQ!

    "Nobody dislikes war more than warriors, but we value the causes of peace so highly that we will not duck a war in an effort to get a lasting peace." -General Daniel "Chappie" James
  • rldowns3rldowns3 Member Posts: 6,096
    edited November -1
    LOL!!! No it was not worth it, trust me! I was getting robbed! LOL!

    annoyaliberal.jpgnotmyfault.gif
  • shooter4shooter4 Member Posts: 4,457
    edited November -1
    Gunnut,

    Accuracy problems with .45's ???? [?][?][?]

    I have 2 .45's that shoot sub 2" groups at 50yds. One is a SA 1911 and the other is a Pardini. A friend has a Les Baer 1911 that holds 1&1/2" at 50yds.

    I think they were either some pos's you had or its you.
  • outdoortexasoutdoortexas Member Posts: 4,780
    edited November -1
    gunnut505,
    not to argue but I've got two Texas Rangers in the family(brother and nephew) and both still carry the Sigs in 45. Don't know about their buddies.
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,539 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I like the 9mm for personal carry. If I want recoil and results I will shoot the .44 Mag.
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    While Henry makes a fine old point when he says that the best round is the one you shoot best, I would simply remind that many old gunners still use the old joke that anything below a .380 is "nice to have if you don't have a gun on you."

    The best for you is the MOST GUN you can shoot well. The 9mm has been marginal since the Germans used it in Lugers. It had an uptick in domestic opinion thanks to some hotter loads and the popularity of hi-capacity magazines (even though the Hi-Power was always out there) and the 10-round mag threw a pretty effective wet blanket on it -- along with companies like Glock and Para-Ord who came out with double-stack .45s and closed the capacity gap. Then the .40 came out and helped make up some of the difference -- now you can even have the Hi-Power in .40.

    I'm reminded again of the true story of the guy in the military who was issued an M1 carbine (110 gr. at 1800 fps). He shot an enemy who kept right on running. He took the carbine back to the ordnance guy, got a .45 1911A1 instead, and had no further problems knocking over the enemy.

    As for recoil, only those who haven't tried the .45 would be much worried by the notion of a difference in "shootability." The truth is, you can shoot .45 and 9mm interchangeably at the range and hardly notice the difference in "kick," even in light guns with alloy and polymer frames. The .45 is not significantly harder to shoot well than the 9mm, either for me or anyone else I've taken to a session.

    The 9 relies on variables like velocity, temporary cavity, mushrooming bullets, special loads, and double-taps to help "make up the difference" in weight and diameter and primary wound cavity.

    Even with all that, the 9mm is still a non-big-bore round that gained popularity via hi-cap mags in the 80s. It is probably enough gun for those who are reluctant to carry anything more effective, and some fine guns like the CZ-75 and Hi-Power and Luger have been made for it, but you would most likely be better off shooting well with any of these other calibers mentioned for defense: 10mm, .40S&W, .357SIG, or .45 ACP. And no doubt the .357 magnum, .44 special, .45 Colt, .41 magnum, or even .44 magnum on the revolver side (to limit this to the most commonly seen rounds in defense guns).

    T. Jefferson: "[When doing Constitutional interpretation], let us [go] back to the time when [it] was adopted. [Rather than] invent a meaning [let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

    lifepatch.giffortbutton2.gif
  • TwoDogsTwoDogs Member Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Being retired LE and carrying a pistol for over 30 years I still can't name a favorite, however the Colt or Browning Hi-power are the top two. Do not rule out a good revolver.
    Pick the one that you shoot well and that you will carry on your person (if allowed in your state). No pistol is of service if not's accessible.
    Furthermore, Get your checkbook ready because just owning one pistol won't make it.
    And Last, get some proper training, tips, and patctice, practice , pratcice....

    Twodogs
  • longhunterlonghunter Member Posts: 3,242
    edited November -1
    Between the two,45 cal. no doubt for me at all....The ole 1911 I had I could shoot WELL.Course I'd had it some 20 years,and dad had it before that.And I am more confident with the 45's knockdown power.If we are talkin selfdefense,assumably we would'nt be needing lotsa range anyhow,tho ole slabsides is up to the task in capable hands.My 2
  • punchiepunchie Member Posts: 2,792
    edited November -1
    Enough said
    standard.jpg
    ANY QUESTIONS


    AN ARMED SOCIETY IS A POLITE SOCIETY
  • dheffleydheffley Member Posts: 25,000
    edited November -1
    Punchie,

    I can see your having storage problems. Send me about a half dozen of those, and I'll keep them in the safe for you.[}:)][:p][:D]

    Measure twice, cut once.
    calipers_open_close_md_wht.gif
    Empty the clip!
    smoking_gun_md_wht.gif
  • gap1916gap1916 Member Posts: 4,977
    edited November -1
    Bullet placement is still the key. You have to hit your target. That being said 45acp = .45 inches. 9mm = .355 inches. Do the math.

    Greg
  • ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    .45 ACP all the way. It may cost more, but you get more bang for your buck.
    Not to mention, did Sam Elliott use a 9mm in "We Were Soldiers?" Did Marines use 9mm's (when they had sidearms) in World War II? Did Billy Dee Williams advertise a malt liquor called "Colt 9mm"?

    I DON'T THINK SO!
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    dheff --
    Actually, I just assumed that Punchie was a man of large girth, and liked to wear them all at once in belt holsters, shoulder holsters, ankle holsters (both legs) etc.... Better safe than sorry! [;)]

    T. Jefferson: "[When doing Constitutional interpretation], let us [go] back to the time when [it] was adopted. [Rather than] invent a meaning [let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

    lifepatch.giffortbutton2.gif
  • p3skykingp3skyking Member Posts: 23,916 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Depends on the job needed. To penetrate, the 9mm is tops. Againist unarmored targets, the 45 is like throwing a brickbat.

    He That Pays The Piper Calls The Tune.
  • robsgunsrobsguns Member Posts: 4,581 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well, I dont have any real proof on either being any better than the other for stopping anything but maybe paper, makes a bigger hole. On the other hand, I have a .45 that Allen sent me, and it came with a drop in 400 Corbon barrel, which I dont believe you can do with the 9mm, and the thing is sweet shooting with either round, so for me, I'd pick the 400 corbon, as I believe it to do what the 9mm would be picked to do, plus I still have the .45, the best of both worlds.

    marinesega2.jpg
    SSgt Ryan E. Roberts, USMC
  • rldowns3rldowns3 Member Posts: 6,096
    edited November -1
    .460 rowland drop in conversion for a 1911.....plenty of punch for just about anything.

    annoyaliberal.jpgnotmyfault.gif
  • 0311marine0311marine Member Posts: 3,233
    edited November -1
    .45 acp all the way... but any caliber with a well aimed shot will put anyone down

    sspic.jpgPistol-01.gif
    SEMPER FI
  • KhegglieKhegglie Member Posts: 330 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Punchie......whats that funny mag finger rest on the stainless pistol at the end of the bottom row??
  • 5db5db Member Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    DWS, the problem with seeds is well documented, but do you have something against stems?

    BTW, we sight our 9's in on the 100 yard range, then if they're ridin' Shetlands just aim lower...[:D]

    If you have one shot...Accu-Shot Website
  • punchiepunchie Member Posts: 2,792
    edited November -1
    Khegglie,
    That is the OEM dogleg magazine for the Randall Lemay model it is on. I actually like the dogleg on the short grip. Have three of the doglegs and one of the rare flat base for the Randall Lemay.

    AN ARMED SOCIETY IS A POLITE SOCIETY
Sign In or Register to comment.