Crazy Left in Virginia

4205raymond

My good friend and neighbor at my house in Virginia informed me that Va. House of Delegates passed a bill to remove qualified immunity for LEO's. As i understand it they want to reduce assault on LEO to misdemeanor from felony. These people are crazy. Blue Lives Matter too. Have not seen a word from Shilowar in ages. Hope he is still hanging in there.

SCOUT5

Again.  If an assault doesn't reach felony level if the action is against a non LEO then it also should not reach the level of a felony if the assault is against a LEO.  No one is more important than anyone else.   

SCOUT5

Qualified immunity is not a simple subject.   It exist on the federal level and differently on state levels.   A blanket statement for or against is not something a can make.   
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-qualified-immunity-and-what-does-it-have-do-police-reform

chiefr

4205raymond said:

My good friend and neighbor at my house in Virginia informed me that Va. House of Delegates passed a bill to remove qualified immunity for LEO's. As i understand it they want to reduce assault on LEO to misdemeanor from felony. These people are crazy. Blue Lives Matter too. Have not seen a word from Shilowar in ages. Hope he is still hanging in there.

OK, I find it totally amazing crap like this is even being considered in America let alone passing in a state senate, but then again DEMOCRATs have taken over Virginia.  This is representative of who these people are. 

Assault is Assault no matter whom the victim is. If the GOVERNMENT is powerful enough to issue such decrees to minimizing punishment for violence against said groups of people, then GOVERNMENT can do anything to include.  urinating away your Bill of Rights. 


Similar behavior happened in Germany back in 1938 and in Russia in 1917.
Good to live in a state with very few DEMOCRATs.

jimdeere

Ray, I think the Democratic State senate killed the bill.

SCOUT5

chiefr said:

Assault is Assault no matter whom the victim is. I

Correct.  So why should it carry more penalty if it is committed against a LEO than is does if it is committed against me or you?  That's the point, not that it should not be punished but rather why should punishment be more.  This issue isn't about making punishment less, it's about unjustly making it more.   One man is no more important than another, at least that's the way it's supposed to be in America.

chiefr

SCOUT5 said:

chiefr said:

Assault is Assault no matter whom the victim is. I

Correct.  So why should it carry more penalty if it is committed against a LEO than is does if it is committed against me or you?  That's the point, not that it should not be punished but rather why should punishment be more.  This issue isn't about making punishment less, it's about unjustly making it more.   One man is no more important than another, at least that's the way it's supposed to be in America.

Your right, its discrimination in its worse form.
Its the hypocrisy of these DEMOCRAT loons that tick me off. These same DEMOCRATs preach to all of us the purpose of government is provide equal opportunity and end discrimination. However, with these people it is OK to discriminate as long as it advances their political agenda.

What makes DEMOCRATs take such bold risks is because main stream media defend them, covers for them, or fails to report.   

4205raymond

I agree the charge should be the same if crime committed against non-LEO or LEO. But why would you reduce charge just because LEO was involved. Am I reading this wrong? Jimdeere hope you are correct. This feels to me like feel good legislation by dummycrats in House of Delegates.

4205raymond

Anyone know if Shilowar is still down in SW Virginia?------------------Ray