In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
quote:Originally posted by JamesRK
quote:Originally posted by m88.358win
Look, I fully understand while you libs do not like or respect Trump but try and understand that some of us patriots do.
I never even suspected it, but I must be one of the libs because I do not like Trump and have no respect for the boy or his traveling carnival. I fear that when a clown is elected President he's no longer amusing but dangerous.
It's interesting to remember that Hitler was considered a "clown" by many Germans when he was appointed Chancellor of Germany in 1933.
I'm not saying Donnie is that bad, but that fact does make your comment far more thought provoking.
After last night's election results we may well be stuck with him, as there is no alternative (a third party candidate means Hilly will be coronated.) I just pray he doesn't make our worst fears come to pass.
quote:Originally posted by Alpine
Respectfully: Both of you are nuts.
And I do not understand anyone thinking that way. That's why we ended up with Obummer for 8 years.
I doubt that was intended respectfully, but your point is valid. Obama told us for over a year exactly what he intended to do and nobody listened or wouldn't believe him. The Donald tells us what he intends to do and people can't or won't believe him either. There are things in the U. S. Constitution the Donald doesn't like. He says he will change them.
The Donald doesn't like the First Amendment. What he can't or won't understand is the fix for free speech you don't like is more free speech. His position on the Second Amendment changes with the weather. I guess we'll see how it works out unless, God help us, we are saved by Hillary.
Oh yeah, The Donald doesn't understand the U. S. Constitution can't be changed by the President. Or at least that doesn't come through when he talks about changing it.
quote:Originally posted by JamesRK
quote:Originally posted by Alpine
Respectfully: Both of you are nuts.
And I do not understand anyone thinking that way. That's why we ended up with Obummer for 8 years.
I doubt that was intended respectfully, but your point is valid. Obama told us for over a year exactly what he intended to do and nobody listened or wouldn't believe him. The Donald tells us what he intends to do and people can't or won't believe him either. There are things in the U. S. Constitution the Donald doesn't like. He says he will change them.
The Donald doesn't like the First Amendment. What he can't or won't understand is the fix for free speech you don't like is more free speech. His position on the Second Amendment changes with the weather. I guess we'll see how it works out unless, God help us, we are saved by Hillary.
I thought Trump said that reporters for newspapers and newscasters should be held liable for wrong statements or facts that are not true. Hummmmm, so that make him against the first amendment?
quote:Originally posted by guns-n-painthorses
quote:Originally posted by JamesRK
quote:Originally posted by Alpine
Respectfully: Both of you are nuts.
And I do not understand anyone thinking that way. That's why we ended up with Obummer for 8 years.
I doubt that was intended respectfully, but your point is valid. Obama told us for over a year exactly what he intended to do and nobody listened or wouldn't believe him. The Donald tells us what he intends to do and people can't or won't believe him either. There are things in the U. S. Constitution the Donald doesn't like. He says he will change them.
The Donald doesn't like the First Amendment. What he can't or won't understand is the fix for free speech you don't like is more free speech. His position on the Second Amendment changes with the weather. I guess we'll see how it works out unless, God help us, we are saved by Hillary.
I thought Trump said that reporters for newspapers and newscasters should be held liable for wrong statements or facts that are not true. Hummmmm, so that make him against the first amendment?
Yes, it very likely does. Being wrong, mistaken, or dishonest is protected under the 1st Amendment. If it is not, there is little point to the 1A. If for no other reason than it would mean 'someone' is in charge of deciding who is 'wrong', or making statements that are not 'true'.
Ever wonder why Orwell's 1984 had a Ministry of Truth as one of its indicators of things to be worried about?
He either doesn't understand the 1A, or doesn't support it.
Comments
quote:Originally posted by m88.358win
Look, I fully understand while you libs do not like or respect Trump but try and understand that some of us patriots do.
I never even suspected it, but I must be one of the libs because I do not like Trump and have no respect for the boy or his traveling carnival. I fear that when a clown is elected President he's no longer amusing but dangerous.
It's interesting to remember that Hitler was considered a "clown" by many Germans when he was appointed Chancellor of Germany in 1933.
I'm not saying Donnie is that bad, but that fact does make your comment far more thought provoking.
After last night's election results we may well be stuck with him, as there is no alternative (a third party candidate means Hilly will be coronated.) I just pray he doesn't make our worst fears come to pass.
Respectfully: Both of you are nuts.
And I do not understand anyone thinking that way. That's why we ended up with Obummer for 8 years.
I doubt that was intended respectfully, but your point is valid. Obama told us for over a year exactly what he intended to do and nobody listened or wouldn't believe him. The Donald tells us what he intends to do and people can't or won't believe him either. There are things in the U. S. Constitution the Donald doesn't like. He says he will change them.
The Donald doesn't like the First Amendment. What he can't or won't understand is the fix for free speech you don't like is more free speech. His position on the Second Amendment changes with the weather. I guess we'll see how it works out unless, God help us, we are saved by Hillary.
quote:Originally posted by Alpine
Respectfully: Both of you are nuts.
And I do not understand anyone thinking that way. That's why we ended up with Obummer for 8 years.
I doubt that was intended respectfully, but your point is valid. Obama told us for over a year exactly what he intended to do and nobody listened or wouldn't believe him. The Donald tells us what he intends to do and people can't or won't believe him either. There are things in the U. S. Constitution the Donald doesn't like. He says he will change them.
The Donald doesn't like the First Amendment. What he can't or won't understand is the fix for free speech you don't like is more free speech. His position on the Second Amendment changes with the weather. I guess we'll see how it works out unless, God help us, we are saved by Hillary.
I thought Trump said that reporters for newspapers and newscasters should be held liable for wrong statements or facts that are not true. Hummmmm, so that make him against the first amendment?
quote:Originally posted by JamesRK
quote:Originally posted by Alpine
Respectfully: Both of you are nuts.
And I do not understand anyone thinking that way. That's why we ended up with Obummer for 8 years.
I doubt that was intended respectfully, but your point is valid. Obama told us for over a year exactly what he intended to do and nobody listened or wouldn't believe him. The Donald tells us what he intends to do and people can't or won't believe him either. There are things in the U. S. Constitution the Donald doesn't like. He says he will change them.
The Donald doesn't like the First Amendment. What he can't or won't understand is the fix for free speech you don't like is more free speech. His position on the Second Amendment changes with the weather. I guess we'll see how it works out unless, God help us, we are saved by Hillary.
I thought Trump said that reporters for newspapers and newscasters should be held liable for wrong statements or facts that are not true. Hummmmm, so that make him against the first amendment?
Yes, it very likely does. Being wrong, mistaken, or dishonest is protected under the 1st Amendment. If it is not, there is little point to the 1A. If for no other reason than it would mean 'someone' is in charge of deciding who is 'wrong', or making statements that are not 'true'.
Ever wonder why Orwell's 1984 had a Ministry of Truth as one of its indicators of things to be worried about?
He either doesn't understand the 1A, or doesn't support it.