In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Anti-Gunners Smart?
BLMSR
Member Posts: 4 ✭✭
Is it just me or are anti-gun*members or what ever* Very poorly informed on the facts. Just today a fellow co worker and i were talking about BP Firearms And Black Firearms*as in DPMS and ect. Well a guy that works in the machine shop*who has a doctors degree in Engineering by the way*
tries telling me and this other guy that the problem with the US *more specifically Texas* Is That Any average Joe can *quote-Walk in to a gun store buy the meanest looking fully auto assault weapons and start spraying everyone* Now this guy is a engineer who has a DR degree and he used the word Spraying and slaughter.. Now that just gets me. Are all Anti-Gun People Like this, Or are there at least some well educated ones that have good arguments? He also seems to think that since i just put a Strike Force Stock on my Mini-14 that it is somehow magically stronger and more accurate than my *quote-Harmless looking Model 700* [:(!]
tries telling me and this other guy that the problem with the US *more specifically Texas* Is That Any average Joe can *quote-Walk in to a gun store buy the meanest looking fully auto assault weapons and start spraying everyone* Now this guy is a engineer who has a DR degree and he used the word Spraying and slaughter.. Now that just gets me. Are all Anti-Gun People Like this, Or are there at least some well educated ones that have good arguments? He also seems to think that since i just put a Strike Force Stock on my Mini-14 that it is somehow magically stronger and more accurate than my *quote-Harmless looking Model 700* [:(!]
Comments
Mechanical Engineers create weapons; Civil Engineers create targets.
That said, which type of engineer do you guys think is more likely to understand the concept of weapons more indepth?? Secondly, which one is more likely to use logic in the determination of what instrument should be the most likely instrument for a person to use to stop these things from happening??
Have any of you guys ever noticed that a political major, a business major, and a medical major are all expected to take coursework in school dealing with ethics, while engineers are not???
Most anti-gun zealots are as stupid when it comes to firearms as their christian counterparts when it comes to anything other than the jeebus.
Anti-gun zealots, anti-Christian zealots - similar idiocy. Both fear something they do not, cannot, or simply refuse to understand.
Brad Steele
quote:Originally posted by chaoslodge
Most anti-gun zealots are as stupid when it comes to firearms as their christian counterparts when it comes to anything other than the jeebus.
Anti-gun zealots, anti-Christian zealots - similar idiocy. Both fear something they do not, cannot, or simply refuse to understand.
OK, entertain me, here...
What is it about a Christian that makes you say they fear something they do not understand, cannot understand, or refuse to understand?? I think they full well understand that which they fear; they fear the wrath of God. They understand what brings them to needing to fear it. That eliminates the whole "cannot understand" aspect, there. If they know something like that, they will refuse to believe otherwise.
I suppose the same could be said about atheists. It isn't that they are afraid of anything, it is that they could be too stupid to be afraid of anything, or ignorant, or whatever. That same idiocy could be linked to antigunners. Antigunners are stupid and ignorant as hell, too. They believe it is not criminals, but law abiders that cause crime, but do not think they should be afraid, because they are too oblivious to the fact that it does happen (apparently, just not to them... yet). They believe the cops will protect them. They believe a whole list of irrational and illogical things.
Without turning this whole argument into a theology thread, no one can prove or disprove any of the theology things, but we can, and have disproved antigun logic, and that is why the idiocy of antigunners, Christians and atheists fail.
You misunderstand. I was commenting upon the idiocy of chaoslodge's anti-Christian comment and equated it, as did you, to the anti-gun idiocy movement.
I happen to be one of those stupid and ignorant atheists. I do, however, respect and support any belief system that is heart felt and has proven to be the (if I may be so bold) Godsend to so many that the Christian faith has proven to be.
Brad Steele
gunphreak:
You misunderstand. I was commenting upon the idiocy of chaoslodge's anti-Christian comment and equated it, as did you, to the anti-gun idiocy movement.
I happen to be one of those stupid and ignorant atheists. I do, however, respect and support any belief system that is heart felt and has proven to be the (if I may be so bold) Godsend to so many that the Christian faith has proven to be.
I'm examining both comments on the same basis, though. Is it a false assumption to believe that atheists believe Christians are stupid, or equally false that Christians believe atheists are stupid???
Regardless of those beliefs, neither of them are provable or disprovable, but antigunners' BS is fully disprovable. Is this correct??
I'm examining both comments on the same basis, though. Is it a false assumption to believe that atheists believe Christians are stupid, or equally false that Christians believe atheists are stupid???
Regardless of those beliefs, neither of them are provable or disprovable, but antigunners' BS is fully disprovable. Is this correct??
Yes,.. yes,.. and yes.[:)]
Brad Steele
quote:Originally posted by gunphreak
I'm examining both comments on the same basis, though. Is it a false assumption to believe that atheists believe Christians are stupid, or equally false that Christians believe atheists are stupid???
Regardless of those beliefs, neither of them are provable or disprovable, but antigunners' BS is fully disprovable. Is this correct??
Yes,.. yes,.. and yes.[:)]
Well, there you go...
They advocate restricting their own Rights, just because they don't care to exert them.
The fact that these people are not smart can be shown without even getting into a conversation with them
They advocate restricting their own Rights, just because they don't care to exert them.
This is definitely relevant. Simple and to the point, which happens to be perhaps the best way to win the argument.
Michael Savage has it right ... "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder"!
And who couldn't agree with something SO damn right? [^]
The stopped clock is still right twice a day.