In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Barz, if you are giving credibility to this story, I mean if you honestly cannot see theis political stunt for what it is that truly says mega tons about you and your thought process. You gobble up every thing CNN feeds you and then try to defend every false accusation that comes along or feeble attempts at making mountains out of molehills with the pety charges against those associated with Trump.
You are no different than the little mellennial butthurt snowflakes that many make youtube videos of. You are nothing but a narrow minded liberal and defending this latest political move proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by bpost
My claim is more supportable.
Barzillia, whilst drunk off his *, groped her not to be mentioned regions and tried to bump uglies with her at a HS party, she forgot who it was after over three decades.
Now, 35 years later in an effort to make her a safe space and feel all better about global warming she blames the other guy.....
Your post demonstrates far more about you, and your ability to think, than anything regarding me.
Congratulations.
Hey, you are the accused, not me. I am just bringing forward relevant information from 30 some odd years ago.
Seems entirely plausible to me, given what Barz demonstrates here.
Precisely, Mr. Perfect!!!!!
Right on time.....
PHASE DETAILS FOR - WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2018
Phase: Waxing Gibbous
Illumination: 73%
Moon Age: 9.64 days
Moon Angle: 0.49
Moon Distance: 405,157.00 km
Sun Angle: 0.53
Sun Distance: 150,252,966.50 km
Precisely.
Giving credence to astrological nonsense isn't helping your case. Tarot cards next, I'd wager. The good book has a few things to say about such practices, ya know.
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by Big Sky Redneck
Barz, if you are giving credibility to this story, I mean if you honestly cannot see theis political stunt for what it is that truly says mega tons about you and your thought process. You gobble up every thing CNN feeds you and then try to defend every false accusation that comes along or feeble attempts at making mountains out of molehills with the pety charges against those associated with Trump.
You are no different than the little mellennial butthurt snowflakes that many make youtube videos of. You are nothing but a narrow minded liberal and defending this latest political move proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
I find it insane that she would even open her mouth over this ridiculous garbage when she is the worlds biggest rape and woman abuser enabler in history.
C&P
CLINTON: ?What I would like to see is a democratic majority that actually has the chance to make that choice right now the Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop the Republicans from going full speed ahead and engaging in the kind of unprecedented behavior as they did with the Garland nomination. So I?m not in favor of either unilateral disarmament or Defcon-10. I think there has to be some effort to try to get back to regular order, try to get back to having a system, a process in place so that we are not subjected to the hardball behavior of the Republicans that we saw in the Garland nomination, and we?re not subject to the outrageous denial of the information that was requested on Kavanaugh.
"I mean, there can?t be one set of rules for Democrats and one set of rules for Republicans. That?s one of the reasons why people don?t have any confidence in the Congress. How can you? You don?t know what?s going to happen from day to day. I remember back in the Thomas hearing when senator bird was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that?s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country.
"And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate. And instead, they are playing the hardest of hardballs to try to pack the court with, you know, another nominee, regardless of the questions. Remember, Rachel, there were lots of questions raised in the hearing itself about some of his testimony, some of the statements he had made when he was first confirmed for the circuit court, and then additional statements. So there were already reasons to doubt the testimony and the positions that he was taking as well as substantive issues that are fair game for senators to explore.?
If reading that doesn't make you want to puke nothing will. Thank God she was not elected as POTUS, Thank God!
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
Hillery has weighed in.
I find it insane that she would even open her mouth over this ridiculous garbage when she is the worlds biggest rape and woman abuser enabler in history.
C&P
CLINTON: ?What I would like to see is a democratic majority that actually has the chance to make that choice right now the Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop the Republicans from going full speed ahead and engaging in the kind of unprecedented behavior as they did with the Garland nomination. So I?m not in favor of either unilateral disarmament or Defcon-10. I think there has to be some effort to try to get back to regular order, try to get back to having a system, a process in place so that we are not subjected to the hardball behavior of the Republicans that we saw in the Garland nomination, and we?re not subject to the outrageous denial of the information that was requested on Kavanaugh.
"I mean, there can?t be one set of rules for Democrats and one set of rules for Republicans. That?s one of the reasons why people don?t have any confidence in the Congress. How can you? You don?t know what?s going to happen from day to day. I remember back in the Thomas hearing when senator bird was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that?s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country.
"And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate. And instead, they are playing the hardest of hardballs to try to pack the court with, you know, another nominee, regardless of the questions. Remember, Rachel, there were lots of questions raised in the hearing itself about some of his testimony, some of the statements he had made when he was first confirmed for the circuit court, and then additional statements. So there were already reasons to doubt the testimony and the positions that he was taking as well as substantive issues that are fair game for senators to explore.?
If reading that doesn't make you want to puke nothing will. Thank God she was not elected as POTUS, Thank God!
Clinton the disease that won't go away. Yea, and we have people who post HERE thinking she is a Goddess.[|)]
She is the most vile hag Satan has took under his wing-
I guess what's equally disturbing is that someone still thinks Hellary is relevant, and assuming that, that her opinion on matters of sexual abuse would be of interest or any credulity.
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
Hillery has weighed in.
I find it insane that she would even open her mouth over this ridiculous garbage when she is the worlds biggest rape and woman abuser enabler in history.
C&P
CLINTON: ?What I would like to see is a democratic majority that actually has the chance to make that choice right now the Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop the Republicans from going full speed ahead and engaging in the kind of unprecedented behavior as they did with the Garland nomination. So I?m not in favor of either unilateral disarmament or Defcon-10. I think there has to be some effort to try to get back to regular order, try to get back to having a system, a process in place so that we are not subjected to the hardball behavior of the Republicans that we saw in the Garland nomination, and we?re not subject to the outrageous denial of the information that was requested on Kavanaugh.
"I mean, there can?t be one set of rules for Democrats and one set of rules for Republicans. That?s one of the reasons why people don?t have any confidence in the Congress. How can you? You don?t know what?s going to happen from day to day. I remember back in the Thomas hearing when senator bird was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that?s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country.
"And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate. And instead, they are playing the hardest of hardballs to try to pack the court with, you know, another nominee, regardless of the questions. Remember, Rachel, there were lots of questions raised in the hearing itself about some of his testimony, some of the statements he had made when he was first confirmed for the circuit court, and then additional statements. So there were already reasons to doubt the testimony and the positions that he was taking as well as substantive issues that are fair game for senators to explore.?
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
Hillery has weighed in.
I find it insane that she would even open her mouth over this ridiculous garbage when she is the worlds biggest rape and woman abuser enabler in history.
C&P
CLINTON: ?What I would like to see is a democratic majority that actually has the chance to make that choice right now the Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop the Republicans from going full speed ahead and engaging in the kind of unprecedented behavior as they did with the Garland nomination. So I?m not in favor of either unilateral disarmament or Defcon-10. I think there has to be some effort to try to get back to regular order, try to get back to having a system, a process in place so that we are not subjected to the hardball behavior of the Republicans that we saw in the Garland nomination, and we?re not subject to the outrageous denial of the information that was requested on Kavanaugh.
"I mean, there can?t be one set of rules for Democrats and one set of rules for Republicans. That?s one of the reasons why people don?t have any confidence in the Congress. How can you? You don?t know what?s going to happen from day to day. I remember back in the Thomas hearing when senator bird was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that?s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country.
"And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate. And instead, they are playing the hardest of hardballs to try to pack the court with, you know, another nominee, regardless of the questions. Remember, Rachel, there were lots of questions raised in the hearing itself about some of his testimony, some of the statements he had made when he was first confirmed for the circuit court, and then additional statements. So there were already reasons to doubt the testimony and the positions that he was taking as well as substantive issues that are fair game for senators to explore.?
If reading that doesn't make you want to puke nothing will. Thank God she was not elected as POTUS, Thank God!
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by bpost
My claim is more supportable.
Barzillia, whilst drunk off his *, groped her not to be mentioned regions and tried to bump uglies with her at a HS party, she forgot who it was after over three decades.
Now, 35 years later in an effort to make her a safe space and feel all better about global warming she blames the other guy.....
Your post demonstrates far more about you, and your ability to think, than anything regarding me.
Congratulations.
Hey, you are the accused, not me. I am just bringing forward relevant information from 30 some odd years ago.
Seems entirely plausible to me, given what Barz demonstrates here.
Precisely, Mr. Perfect!!!!!
Right on time.....
PHASE DETAILS FOR - WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2018
Phase: Waxing Gibbous
Illumination: 73%
Moon Age: 9.64 days
Moon Angle: 0.49
Moon Distance: 405,157.00 km
Sun Angle: 0.53
Sun Distance: 150,252,966.50 km
Precisely.
Aaaaaand, He's gone![:D]
There is no such thing as Liberal Men, only Liberal Women with Penises.'
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
In Maine radio interview, SenatorCollins says of Dr Ford: "much to my surprise it now appears she?s turning down all 3 options even though her attorney said earlier this week that she would come testify." "I just don?t understand why the hearing shouldn?t go forth," she says.
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Hmmmmmmm, that might explain her unwillingness to testify.
So, if she won't testify what is the point for democrats?
A very good, underhanded sleazy tactic but what would any one (but barz) expect.
You see if the republicans push forward and do not delay and make a lengthy FBI investigation they are trounces on all women rape victims everywhere those chauvinist basstards and since the dems don't have a single positive counter to campaign on just we hate Trump, GOP bad etc etc.
If they delay the hearings long enough he won't be confirmed and they hope to take the Senate and get someone at least more center than right maybe even left of center another Kennedy.
I must admit as low as they are going and as obvious it is to anyone with an IQ larger than the number of fingers on their right hand this really is good low life politics and for that I salute their depravity of our system.
A new low and remember this libs, you made this something the GOP can do when you are back in power and boy will you cry like babies when they do exactly what you are doing in this case
"Fools learn from their own mistakes. I learn from the mistakes of others"
Otto von Bismarck
That was an interesting read. Not quite so innocent are they.
Let's have a hearing and ask the accuser some questions about the things described in her yearbook.
One section talks about 'while out partying, some seniors discovered that two heads are better than one.
'Dr. Ford, did you ever hitch up to the Teenager Choo-Choo?'. 'Were you the caboose at the end, or more the coal car in the middle?'
Just asking the questions would be fun. Remember, LBJ once wanted to accuse a political opponent of F***ing pigs. When one of his aides said 'we can't do that, it isn't true', LBJ responded "I know it's not true. I just want to watch the SOB deny it".
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
I do not know what the facts of the alleged interaction actually are.
How is that you do, to make such a claim ?
Probably because she released a statement about it already.
1) She doesn't remember exactly when it happened (denying Kavanaugh any chance of an alibi)
2) She doesn't remember where it happened (denying the property owners a chance to say there was no party at that time)
3) The other guy in the room, who supposedly broke up the rape in progress, said it never happened.
And so you don't have any facts regarding the alleged incident, either.
Both Kelly Ann Conway and POTUS say they need to give a hearing to the claims.
Perhaps they should.
We'll see !
According to HER statement, SHE doesn't have any facts about it either. NO witnesses, NO date that it happened, NO location, she told NOBODY - Because it DID NOT happen.
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by penguin
Allow the legal system to handle it.
Okay, the alleged assault was over 35 years ago; statute of limitations are so far in the past they are a distant cloud in a near galaxy. Then, she admitted they were both teens, that makes it a juvenile matter; that ship sailed years ago.
The FBI does not investigate "drunken groping". Quadruple that when no actual sex was alleged. The accuser can't tell the date of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser can't tell the location of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser has not said her clothing was removed, opened, unbuttoned or her skin was actually touched during the alleged attack.
The accused supposed third party witness said he has no recollection of such an assault. All school references to the drinking sex fueled life of her and her class has been scrubbed from the internet.
She is as full of Shiite as a spring goose; driven by Marxist agendas to delay and resist.
Piss on her and the horse she rode in on. This is pure unadulterated political skullduggery and garbage.
QED
The senate has a job to do advise and confirm SCOUTS appointees; not Bork every republican nominee every to come in front of them.
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by penguin
Allow the legal system to handle it.
Okay, the alleged assault was over 35 years ago; statute of limitations are so far in the past they are a distant cloud in a near galaxy. Then, she admitted they were both teens, that makes it a juvenile matter; that ship sailed years ago.
The FBI does not investigate "drunken groping". Quadruple that when no actual sex was alleged. The accuser can't tell the date of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser can't tell the location of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser has not said her clothing was removed, opened, unbuttoned or her skin was actually touched during the alleged attack.
The accused supposed third party witness said he has no recollection of such an assault. All school references to the drinking sex fueled life of her and her class has been scrubbed from the internet.
She is as full of Shiite as a spring goose; driven by Marxist agendas to delay and resist.
Piss on her and the horse she rode in on. This is pure unadulterated political skullduggery and garbage.
QED
The senate has a job to do advise and confirm SCOUTS appointees; not Bork every republican nominee ever to come in front of them.
The Repubs better drive this home NEXT week, the spineless basturds better quit playing and not let these complete sham tactics take over.
I am amazed at how low the DEMO LIBS will go,,,NOTHING they want do, nothing.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by penguin
Allow the legal system to handle it.
Okay, the alleged assault was over 35 years ago; statute of limitations are so far in the past they are a distant cloud in a near galaxy. Then, she admitted they were both teens, that makes it a juvenile matter; that ship sailed years ago.
The FBI does not investigate "drunken groping". Quadruple that when no actual sex was alleged. The accuser can't tell the date of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser can't tell the location of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser has not said her clothing was removed, opened, unbuttoned or her skin was actually touched during the alleged attack.
The accused supposed third party witness said he has no recollection of such an assault. All school references to the drinking sex fueled life of her and her class has been scrubbed from the internet.
She is as full of Shiite as a spring goose; driven by Marxist agendas to delay and resist.
Piss on her and the horse she rode in on. This is pure unadulterated political skullduggery and garbage.
QED
The senate has a job to do advise and confirm SCOUTS appointees; not Bork every republican nominee every to come in front of them.
Bruce, as I posted above, the statute of limitations is not up on this.
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
Matt Walsh nails it:
Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
I don't know where you get your info from, but that is not what is happening around here. Women are coming out in force for Brett, 90% see Ford as a fraud.
Just like "polls" said Hillary will win by landslide. If they indulge the screaming child and miss the flight to vacation, they will be even madder.
The Democrats have yet to deny that this is an eleventh hour ploy to postpone the process.
There is an open seat on th SCOTUS. Poop or get off the pot.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
It is a risky game, but the tide seems to be turning as Ford struggles with the decision to testify. People understand that you cannot simply throw bombs and expect to remain anonymous and unchallenged. Her problem is that she is an anti-Trump activist and her Senator has used her as a pawn in a game of political brinksmanship. There would have been no deadline issue had she and Feinstein not waited until the last minute to release the charges. If there interest was truly to protect the integrity of the Supreme Court, the charges would have been brought to the FBI months ago, and not held back as an ace in the hole.
Something may have happened 34, 35, 36 years ago. If these two agenda driven leftists had acted properly, she would have been interviewed during the normal background check process, and it would have either resulted in Kavanaugh's candidacy being confirmed or removed.
As it is, it smacks of a tactical political ploy, and if most media outlets can be believed, more and more people are viewing it as such.
Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
It is a risky game, but the tide seems to be turning as Ford struggles with the decision to testify. People understand that you cannot simply throw bombs and expect to remain anonymous and unchallenged. Her problem is that she is an anti-Trump activist and her Senator has used her as a pawn in a game of political brinksmanship. There would have been no deadline issue had she and Feinstein not waited until the last minute to release the charges. If there interest was truly to protect the integrity of the Supreme Court, the charges would have been brought to the FBI months ago, and not held back as an ace in the hole.
Something may have happened 34, 35, 36 years ago. If these two agenda driven leftists had acted properly, she would have been interviewed during the normal background check process, and it would have either resulted in Kavanaugh's candidacy being confirmed or removed.
As it is, it smacks of a tactical political ploy, and if most media outlets can be believed, more and more people are viewing it as such.
I see this for what it is, thinking outside the box and taking in everything.
Simply put, the dems cannot have this man confirmed, in doin so eliminates thier chsnces of having an activist court for many years.
If this confirmation is delayed and no vote is taken and the dems win back control in Novemeber not inly is Trump shut down but that seat will remain open untill a dem takes the presidency again.
This Me Too movement has merit but also has far damaging side effects meaning that a womans word is mostly unquestioned. Accusations can be made and lives destroyed with little or no evidence, who remembers Kobe Bryant or the sports team from (I can?t remember the college), yes sometimes those accusations are false but even if proven false the damage is done.
So fienstien had this information in July, she did not act on it, this was a carefully thought out plan, part of thier agenda. And thiet agenda is so rabid that they will attempt to destroy a good man in order to preserve thier agenda. The left is ?off rhe chain? and desperate, thier evil has no bounds and anyone in thier way is toast. One only has to look at the other headlines involving warrants and investigations to see thier agenda, they were calling for impeachment before the inaguration!
The dems lost, now they want to take it back and they will stop at nothing to get it back. Power has corrupted and it shows.
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
She is a victim only in the eyes of the SJW's. Ford is not a actually a victim in any sense of the word; she is a symptom of the Marxist (D) party agenda of RESIST, no matter what.
Comments
Barz, if you are giving credibility to this story, I mean if you honestly cannot see theis political stunt for what it is that truly says mega tons about you and your thought process. You gobble up every thing CNN feeds you and then try to defend every false accusation that comes along or feeble attempts at making mountains out of molehills with the pety charges against those associated with Trump.
You are no different than the little mellennial butthurt snowflakes that many make youtube videos of. You are nothing but a narrow minded liberal and defending this latest political move proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Do you touch yerself when you read these stories?
Now that we are completely off the rails:
Enjoy.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=when+I+think+about+you,+i+touch+myself&form=IE10TR&src=IE10TR&pc=DCJB
Brad Steele
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by bpost
My claim is more supportable.
Barzillia, whilst drunk off his *, groped her not to be mentioned regions and tried to bump uglies with her at a HS party, she forgot who it was after over three decades.
Now, 35 years later in an effort to make her a safe space and feel all better about global warming she blames the other guy.....
Your post demonstrates far more about you, and your ability to think, than anything regarding me.
Congratulations.
Hey, you are the accused, not me. I am just bringing forward relevant information from 30 some odd years ago.
Seems entirely plausible to me, given what Barz demonstrates here.
Precisely, Mr. Perfect!!!!!
Right on time.....
PHASE DETAILS FOR - WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2018
Phase: Waxing Gibbous
Illumination: 73%
Moon Age: 9.64 days
Moon Angle: 0.49
Moon Distance: 405,157.00 km
Sun Angle: 0.53
Sun Distance: 150,252,966.50 km
Precisely.
Giving credence to astrological nonsense isn't helping your case. Tarot cards next, I'd wager. The good book has a few things to say about such practices, ya know.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by Big Sky Redneck
Barz, if you are giving credibility to this story, I mean if you honestly cannot see theis political stunt for what it is that truly says mega tons about you and your thought process. You gobble up every thing CNN feeds you and then try to defend every false accusation that comes along or feeble attempts at making mountains out of molehills with the pety charges against those associated with Trump.
You are no different than the little mellennial butthurt snowflakes that many make youtube videos of. You are nothing but a narrow minded liberal and defending this latest political move proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Do you touch yerself when you read these stories?
Now that we are completely off the rails:
Enjoy.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=when+I+think+about+you,+i+touch+myself&form=IE10TR&src=IE10TR&pc=DCJB
It just wouldn?t be be if I didn?t say something stupid now would it [:D][8D]
I find it insane that she would even open her mouth over this ridiculous garbage when she is the worlds biggest rape and woman abuser enabler in history.
https://news.grabien.com/story-hillary-kavanaughs-accuser-deserves-benefit-doubt
C&P
CLINTON: ?What I would like to see is a democratic majority that actually has the chance to make that choice right now the Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop the Republicans from going full speed ahead and engaging in the kind of unprecedented behavior as they did with the Garland nomination. So I?m not in favor of either unilateral disarmament or Defcon-10. I think there has to be some effort to try to get back to regular order, try to get back to having a system, a process in place so that we are not subjected to the hardball behavior of the Republicans that we saw in the Garland nomination, and we?re not subject to the outrageous denial of the information that was requested on Kavanaugh.
"I mean, there can?t be one set of rules for Democrats and one set of rules for Republicans. That?s one of the reasons why people don?t have any confidence in the Congress. How can you? You don?t know what?s going to happen from day to day. I remember back in the Thomas hearing when senator bird was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that?s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country.
"And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate. And instead, they are playing the hardest of hardballs to try to pack the court with, you know, another nominee, regardless of the questions. Remember, Rachel, there were lots of questions raised in the hearing itself about some of his testimony, some of the statements he had made when he was first confirmed for the circuit court, and then additional statements. So there were already reasons to doubt the testimony and the positions that he was taking as well as substantive issues that are fair game for senators to explore.?
If reading that doesn't make you want to puke nothing will. Thank God she was not elected as POTUS, Thank God!
Hillery has weighed in.
I find it insane that she would even open her mouth over this ridiculous garbage when she is the worlds biggest rape and woman abuser enabler in history.
https://news.grabien.com/story-hillary-kavanaughs-accuser-deserves-benefit-doubt
C&P
CLINTON: ?What I would like to see is a democratic majority that actually has the chance to make that choice right now the Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop the Republicans from going full speed ahead and engaging in the kind of unprecedented behavior as they did with the Garland nomination. So I?m not in favor of either unilateral disarmament or Defcon-10. I think there has to be some effort to try to get back to regular order, try to get back to having a system, a process in place so that we are not subjected to the hardball behavior of the Republicans that we saw in the Garland nomination, and we?re not subject to the outrageous denial of the information that was requested on Kavanaugh.
"I mean, there can?t be one set of rules for Democrats and one set of rules for Republicans. That?s one of the reasons why people don?t have any confidence in the Congress. How can you? You don?t know what?s going to happen from day to day. I remember back in the Thomas hearing when senator bird was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that?s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country.
"And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate. And instead, they are playing the hardest of hardballs to try to pack the court with, you know, another nominee, regardless of the questions. Remember, Rachel, there were lots of questions raised in the hearing itself about some of his testimony, some of the statements he had made when he was first confirmed for the circuit court, and then additional statements. So there were already reasons to doubt the testimony and the positions that he was taking as well as substantive issues that are fair game for senators to explore.?
If reading that doesn't make you want to puke nothing will. Thank God she was not elected as POTUS, Thank God!
Clinton the disease that won't go away. Yea, and we have people who post HERE thinking she is a Goddess.[|)]
She is the most vile hag Satan has took under his wing-
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Hillery has weighed in.
I find it insane that she would even open her mouth over this ridiculous garbage when she is the worlds biggest rape and woman abuser enabler in history.
https://news.grabien.com/story-hillary-kavanaughs-accuser-deserves-benefit-doubt
C&P
CLINTON: ?What I would like to see is a democratic majority that actually has the chance to make that choice right now the Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop the Republicans from going full speed ahead and engaging in the kind of unprecedented behavior as they did with the Garland nomination. So I?m not in favor of either unilateral disarmament or Defcon-10. I think there has to be some effort to try to get back to regular order, try to get back to having a system, a process in place so that we are not subjected to the hardball behavior of the Republicans that we saw in the Garland nomination, and we?re not subject to the outrageous denial of the information that was requested on Kavanaugh.
"I mean, there can?t be one set of rules for Democrats and one set of rules for Republicans. That?s one of the reasons why people don?t have any confidence in the Congress. How can you? You don?t know what?s going to happen from day to day. I remember back in the Thomas hearing when senator bird was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that?s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country.
"And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate. And instead, they are playing the hardest of hardballs to try to pack the court with, you know, another nominee, regardless of the questions. Remember, Rachel, there were lots of questions raised in the hearing itself about some of his testimony, some of the statements he had made when he was first confirmed for the circuit court, and then additional statements. So there were already reasons to doubt the testimony and the positions that he was taking as well as substantive issues that are fair game for senators to explore.?
Juanita Broderick says hello.
Hillery has weighed in.
I find it insane that she would even open her mouth over this ridiculous garbage when she is the worlds biggest rape and woman abuser enabler in history.
https://news.grabien.com/story-hillary-kavanaughs-accuser-deserves-benefit-doubt
C&P
CLINTON: ?What I would like to see is a democratic majority that actually has the chance to make that choice right now the Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop the Republicans from going full speed ahead and engaging in the kind of unprecedented behavior as they did with the Garland nomination. So I?m not in favor of either unilateral disarmament or Defcon-10. I think there has to be some effort to try to get back to regular order, try to get back to having a system, a process in place so that we are not subjected to the hardball behavior of the Republicans that we saw in the Garland nomination, and we?re not subject to the outrageous denial of the information that was requested on Kavanaugh.
"I mean, there can?t be one set of rules for Democrats and one set of rules for Republicans. That?s one of the reasons why people don?t have any confidence in the Congress. How can you? You don?t know what?s going to happen from day to day. I remember back in the Thomas hearing when senator bird was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that?s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country.
"And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate. And instead, they are playing the hardest of hardballs to try to pack the court with, you know, another nominee, regardless of the questions. Remember, Rachel, there were lots of questions raised in the hearing itself about some of his testimony, some of the statements he had made when he was first confirmed for the circuit court, and then additional statements. So there were already reasons to doubt the testimony and the positions that he was taking as well as substantive issues that are fair game for senators to explore.?
If reading that doesn't make you want to puke nothing will. Thank God she was not elected as POTUS, Thank God!
+ that!
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by bpost
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by bpost
My claim is more supportable.
Barzillia, whilst drunk off his *, groped her not to be mentioned regions and tried to bump uglies with her at a HS party, she forgot who it was after over three decades.
Now, 35 years later in an effort to make her a safe space and feel all better about global warming she blames the other guy.....
Your post demonstrates far more about you, and your ability to think, than anything regarding me.
Congratulations.
Hey, you are the accused, not me. I am just bringing forward relevant information from 30 some odd years ago.
Seems entirely plausible to me, given what Barz demonstrates here.
Precisely, Mr. Perfect!!!!!
Right on time.....
PHASE DETAILS FOR - WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2018
Phase: Waxing Gibbous
Illumination: 73%
Moon Age: 9.64 days
Moon Angle: 0.49
Moon Distance: 405,157.00 km
Sun Angle: 0.53
Sun Distance: 150,252,966.50 km
Precisely.
Aaaaaand, He's gone![:D]
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
hahahahaha
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html
Check this out:
http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html
That was an interesting read. Not quite so innocent are they.
quote:Originally posted by HandLoad
Check this out:
http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html
That was an interesting read. Not quite so innocent are they.
The digging of dirt has just started and will continue 24/7.
So, if she won't testify what is the point for democrats?
A very good, underhanded sleazy tactic but what would any one (but barz) expect.
You see if the republicans push forward and do not delay and make a lengthy FBI investigation they are trounces on all women rape victims everywhere those chauvinist basstards and since the dems don't have a single positive counter to campaign on just we hate Trump, GOP bad etc etc.
If they delay the hearings long enough he won't be confirmed and they hope to take the Senate and get someone at least more center than right maybe even left of center another Kennedy.
I must admit as low as they are going and as obvious it is to anyone with an IQ larger than the number of fingers on their right hand this really is good low life politics and for that I salute their depravity of our system.
A new low and remember this libs, you made this something the GOP can do when you are back in power and boy will you cry like babies when they do exactly what you are doing in this case
"Fools learn from their own mistakes. I learn from the mistakes of others"
Otto von Bismarck
quote:Originally posted by HandLoad
Check this out:
http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html
That was an interesting read. Not quite so innocent are they.
Let's have a hearing and ask the accuser some questions about the things described in her yearbook.
One section talks about 'while out partying, some seniors discovered that two heads are better than one.
'Dr. Ford, did you ever hitch up to the Teenager Choo-Choo?'. 'Were you the caboose at the end, or more the coal car in the middle?'
Just asking the questions would be fun. Remember, LBJ once wanted to accuse a political opponent of F***ing pigs. When one of his aides said 'we can't do that, it isn't true', LBJ responded "I know it's not true. I just want to watch the SOB deny it".
quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
hahahahaha
One good laugh after another, Randy! [:D]
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
I do not know what the facts of the alleged interaction actually are.
How is that you do, to make such a claim ?
Probably because she released a statement about it already.
1) She doesn't remember exactly when it happened (denying Kavanaugh any chance of an alibi)
2) She doesn't remember where it happened (denying the property owners a chance to say there was no party at that time)
3) The other guy in the room, who supposedly broke up the rape in progress, said it never happened.
And so you don't have any facts regarding the alleged incident, either.
Both Kelly Ann Conway and POTUS say they need to give a hearing to the claims.
Perhaps they should.
We'll see !
According to HER statement, SHE doesn't have any facts about it either. NO witnesses, NO date that it happened, NO location, she told NOBODY - Because it DID NOT happen.
It's complete and total BS - Plain and simple.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Allow the legal system to handle it.
Okay, the alleged assault was over 35 years ago; statute of limitations are so far in the past they are a distant cloud in a near galaxy. Then, she admitted they were both teens, that makes it a juvenile matter; that ship sailed years ago.
The FBI does not investigate "drunken groping". Quadruple that when no actual sex was alleged. The accuser can't tell the date of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser can't tell the location of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser has not said her clothing was removed, opened, unbuttoned or her skin was actually touched during the alleged attack.
The accused supposed third party witness said he has no recollection of such an assault. All school references to the drinking sex fueled life of her and her class has been scrubbed from the internet.
She is as full of Shiite as a spring goose; driven by Marxist agendas to delay and resist.
Piss on her and the horse she rode in on. This is pure unadulterated political skullduggery and garbage.
QED
The senate has a job to do advise and confirm SCOUTS appointees; not Bork every republican nominee every to come in front of them.
quote:Originally posted by penguin
Allow the legal system to handle it.
Okay, the alleged assault was over 35 years ago; statute of limitations are so far in the past they are a distant cloud in a near galaxy. Then, she admitted they were both teens, that makes it a juvenile matter; that ship sailed years ago.
The FBI does not investigate "drunken groping". Quadruple that when no actual sex was alleged. The accuser can't tell the date of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser can't tell the location of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser has not said her clothing was removed, opened, unbuttoned or her skin was actually touched during the alleged attack.
The accused supposed third party witness said he has no recollection of such an assault. All school references to the drinking sex fueled life of her and her class has been scrubbed from the internet.
She is as full of Shiite as a spring goose; driven by Marxist agendas to delay and resist.
Piss on her and the horse she rode in on. This is pure unadulterated political skullduggery and garbage.
QED
The senate has a job to do advise and confirm SCOUTS appointees; not Bork every republican nominee ever to come in front of them.
I am amazed at how low the DEMO LIBS will go,,,NOTHING they want do, nothing.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
Brad Steele
quote:Originally posted by penguin
Allow the legal system to handle it.
Okay, the alleged assault was over 35 years ago; statute of limitations are so far in the past they are a distant cloud in a near galaxy. Then, she admitted they were both teens, that makes it a juvenile matter; that ship sailed years ago.
The FBI does not investigate "drunken groping". Quadruple that when no actual sex was alleged. The accuser can't tell the date of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser can't tell the location of the alleged attack, she was drunk on her * too. The accuser has not said her clothing was removed, opened, unbuttoned or her skin was actually touched during the alleged attack.
The accused supposed third party witness said he has no recollection of such an assault. All school references to the drinking sex fueled life of her and her class has been scrubbed from the internet.
She is as full of Shiite as a spring goose; driven by Marxist agendas to delay and resist.
Piss on her and the horse she rode in on. This is pure unadulterated political skullduggery and garbage.
QED
The senate has a job to do advise and confirm SCOUTS appointees; not Bork every republican nominee every to come in front of them.
Bruce, as I posted above, the statute of limitations is not up on this.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
Matt Walsh nails it:
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
I don't know where you get your info from, but that is not what is happening around here. Women are coming out in force for Brett, 90% see Ford as a fraud.
Just like "polls" said Hillary will win by landslide. If they indulge the screaming child and miss the flight to vacation, they will be even madder.
Our leaders NEED to show LEADERSHIP.
There is an open seat on th SCOTUS. Poop or get off the pot.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
It is a risky game, but the tide seems to be turning as Ford struggles with the decision to testify. People understand that you cannot simply throw bombs and expect to remain anonymous and unchallenged. Her problem is that she is an anti-Trump activist and her Senator has used her as a pawn in a game of political brinksmanship. There would have been no deadline issue had she and Feinstein not waited until the last minute to release the charges. If there interest was truly to protect the integrity of the Supreme Court, the charges would have been brought to the FBI months ago, and not held back as an ace in the hole.
Something may have happened 34, 35, 36 years ago. If these two agenda driven leftists had acted properly, she would have been interviewed during the normal background check process, and it would have either resulted in Kavanaugh's candidacy being confirmed or removed.
As it is, it smacks of a tactical political ploy, and if most media outlets can be believed, more and more people are viewing it as such.
Brad Steele
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
It is a risky game, but the tide seems to be turning as Ford struggles with the decision to testify. People understand that you cannot simply throw bombs and expect to remain anonymous and unchallenged. Her problem is that she is an anti-Trump activist and her Senator has used her as a pawn in a game of political brinksmanship. There would have been no deadline issue had she and Feinstein not waited until the last minute to release the charges. If there interest was truly to protect the integrity of the Supreme Court, the charges would have been brought to the FBI months ago, and not held back as an ace in the hole.
Something may have happened 34, 35, 36 years ago. If these two agenda driven leftists had acted properly, she would have been interviewed during the normal background check process, and it would have either resulted in Kavanaugh's candidacy being confirmed or removed.
As it is, it smacks of a tactical political ploy, and if most media outlets can be believed, more and more people are viewing it as such.
I see this for what it is, thinking outside the box and taking in everything.
Simply put, the dems cannot have this man confirmed, in doin so eliminates thier chsnces of having an activist court for many years.
If this confirmation is delayed and no vote is taken and the dems win back control in Novemeber not inly is Trump shut down but that seat will remain open untill a dem takes the presidency again.
This Me Too movement has merit but also has far damaging side effects meaning that a womans word is mostly unquestioned. Accusations can be made and lives destroyed with little or no evidence, who remembers Kobe Bryant or the sports team from (I can?t remember the college), yes sometimes those accusations are false but even if proven false the damage is done.
So fienstien had this information in July, she did not act on it, this was a carefully thought out plan, part of thier agenda. And thiet agenda is so rabid that they will attempt to destroy a good man in order to preserve thier agenda. The left is ?off rhe chain? and desperate, thier evil has no bounds and anyone in thier way is toast. One only has to look at the other headlines involving warrants and investigations to see thier agenda, they were calling for impeachment before the inaguration!
The dems lost, now they want to take it back and they will stop at nothing to get it back. Power has corrupted and it shows.
Headline on one of the MSN articles very long. Didn't read the complete text, but read enough to know this woman is bat sheet crazy
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-moved-3000-miles-to-reinvent-her-life-it-wasn?t-far-enough/ar-AAAtFVi?ocid=spartanntp
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
The circus continues.
Ford says she will testify IF Kavanaugh testifies first, and there are no lawyers doing the questioning.
Kavanaugh states he has no knowledge of the party, so I guess his testimony will be 'I don't know what she is talking about'.
If he goes any further, her lawyers will parse every syllable in the hopes to find the remotest inconsistency in his words or words for any third party that has been identified over the past couple of weeks.
While I understand this is not a trial, it seems ridiculous to even entertain the motion of the defense being forced to present its case first.
The longer this goes on, the less credible the claim, as Ford seems to be playing directly from the anti-Trump playbook.
I think that a larger game is in play, that of placing the old white republicans in a position they know to be a very tight spot, especially among women.
Delaying the vote is also a consideration, as good old boy Brett is losing public approval every day. The public doesn't vote to move him out of committee, or to approve the nomination, but they do most certainly vote for senators who will. That is not lost upon them.
Foolishly forcing to meet some sort of artificial deadline demand simply makes Ford out to be even more of a victim.
She is a victim only in the eyes of the SJW's. Ford is not a actually a victim in any sense of the word; she is a symptom of the Marxist (D) party agenda of RESIST, no matter what.
folded.
Incredible nonsense.
If Kavanaugh is not seated by mid-terms
they lost the battle.
The 48 hour extension should not have been granted.